COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ^ | 2022 Apr 22 | Russell L. Blaylock

[bitt]

The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[3,6,57] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.

For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines. For the first time in history medical treatment, protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient—including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the CDC, WHO, state public health officers and hospital administrators.[23,38]

The media (TV, newspapers, magazines, etc), medical societies, state medical boards and the owners of social media have appointed themselves to be the sole source of information concerning this so-called “pandemic”. Websites have been removed, highly credentialed and experienced clinical doctors and scientific experts in the field of infectious diseases have been demonized, careers have been destroyed and all dissenting information has been labeled “misinformation” and “dangerous lies”, even when sourced from top experts in the fields of virology, infectious diseases, pulmonary critical care, and epidemiology. These blackouts of truth occur even when this information is backed by extensive scientific citations from some of the most qualified medical specialists in the world.[23] Incredibly, even individuals, such as Dr. Michael Yeadon, a retired ex-Chief Scientist, and vice-president for the science division of Pfizer Pharmaceutical company in the UK, who charged the company with making an extremely dangerous vaccine, is ignored and demonized. Further, he, along with other highly qualified scientists have stated that no one should take this vaccine.

...more

[Deaf and Discerning]

I realize this is really an old thread started last month, but I felt I needed to respond to this, as it COULD pertain to any future catastrophes similar to Covid:

This thread referred to an April article from Balock. As I “judge” which is worse - the virus, the vaccine, or both if you already got symptoms and got vaccinated anyways, to wear or not to wear masks, etc. - I find it intriguing these FR threads can become really emotional, especially when I read comments like “WOW!!!”, “This doctor appears to be a bit of a quack”, “that website is (or not) reliable”, “I gave you a LONG list of .gov provided studies, on the effects”, and “I provided a credible source that shows mushroom extract does not prevent or cure cancer.”

Here is my personal analysis of these comments:

> Some responses are extremely supportive of what someone else wrote or read.

> Some of these comments are friendly disagreements and some are sarcastically humorous, which I love to read.

> Some of these are clearly opinions without providing any sources or evidence, which is what a lawyer would NOT do in a courtroom. But I do benefit from these opinions, to help form my own opinions.

> But some comments are so nasty that I could do without reading. Those FR contributors either are clearly too far to the left or communists; they don’t belong in FR.

Here are my “opinions” on information of Covid and vaccines, that could apply to similar future health-related catastrophes:

> There is no such thing as a “fully reliable” website; all sites do include some wrong info, some more than others. I feel it is wrong to provide a “LONG list of .gov provided studies” and expect them ALL to be considered “reliable”. For example, I don’t trust what I read in cdc.gov to provide sound data 100% of the time. They will write only what they want you to read.

> It has been historically known that it takes YEARS to design a vaccine. Someone (Fauci) obviously pushed a panic button and felt Covid was so hazardous and needed to come up with a solution (vaccine) quickly. And they came up with 3 different ones, to “see what works and what doesn’t work”. And now, there appears to be some evidence vaccines were (deliberately?) designed to do more harm than good.

> No one can really know what long term effects of Covid and/or vaccines can do. Today, we are in a wait-and-see mode. Not very comforting.

> Today, it appears it was unnecessary for the whole world to shut down like it did for two years. The next time this happens, I won’t know what to do, or who to believe and trust.

But those are my opinions. And I pray for those who are ill today from either the virus or vaccines for full recovery, and I hope “man-made” catastrophes like this never happens again.

I apologize for this late post.