Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifty

“The amount owed to each athlete would be the half of the sport’s total revenue minus the team’s total student grant-in-aid package divided by the number of players.”

Nice try, California, but Title IX insists excess funds from male sports’ revenue be spent on female sports. College sports teams receive name recognition which is valuable for fundraising, but sports-team spending already exceeds revenue in nearly every case, except a few rare instances when net revenue may get carried over for a few years.


22 posted on 05/18/2022 1:26:47 PM PDT by dangus (I had some sympathies for some of Russia's positions... until they started a G-d-damned war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

It sounds like this will be a “make lawyers rich” bill while all the parties sue in each other in a circular firing squad.


23 posted on 05/18/2022 1:29:32 PM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
“The amount owed to each athlete would be the half of the sport’s total revenue minus the team’s total student grant-in-aid package divided by the number of players.” Nice try, California, but Title IX insists excess funds from male sports’ revenue be spent on female sports...

Maybe this rule will apply to women's sports too. The math would sure be fun: (Large negative number) - (All their scholarships) / # of players = Total bill each player owes for the privilege of playing

33 posted on 05/18/2022 2:32:08 PM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson