US Trade Deficit With Communist China Is Climbing-This isn't free trade; it's subsidizing a tyrant

At the White House press briefing last Dec. 6, press secretary Jen Psaki made it clear that President Joe Biden wanted the People's Republic of China to pay a price for its human rights abuses.

He would do so by declining to send any U.S. government officials to the Beijing Winter Olympics, which would be held in February.

"The Biden administration," Psaki said, "will not send any diplomatic or official representation to the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics and Paralympic Games given the PRC's ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and other human rights abuses."

"U.S. diplomatic or official representation would treat these games as business as usual in the face of the PRC's egregious human rights abuses and atrocities in Xinjiang," she said. "And we simply can't do that."

But business as usual with the PRC did continue in the business arena, if not the Olympic one.

In fact, in the days leading up to and through the Beijing Olympics, U.S. imports from China increased.

In January 2021, according to the Census Bureau, the United States imported $39,111,200,000 in goods from the PRC, while exporting only $12,860,900,000. The result was a bilateral monthly trade deficit of $26,250,200,000.

In January of this year, the month after Biden announced that no U.S. officials would attend the Beijing Olympics, this nation exported $11,475,200,000 in goods to China, while importing $47,846,900,000. That resulted in a bilateral monthly trade deficit of $36,371,700,000.

That was up $10,121,500,000 — or 38.6% — from the January 2021 bilateral trade deficit of $26,250,200,000.

February and March saw a similar pattern. In February 2022, the United States bought $42,260,000,000 in goods from China (up from $34,027,400,000 in 2021) and ran a monthly bilateral trade deficit of $30,666,000,000 (up from $24,617,000,000 in 2021).

In March 2022, the United States bought $47,373,500,000 in goods from China (up from $40,229,000,000 in 2021) and ran a monthly bilateral trade deficit of $33,998,400,000 (up from $27,686,700,000 in 2021).

In the first three months of this year, America's cumulative merchandise trade deficit with China was $101,036,100,000.

We are on our way to running an annual merchandise trade deficit with China that will exceed $400 billion.

The U.S. State Department last month released its 2021 Country Report on Human Rights in China.

"The People's Republic of China is an authoritarian state in which the Chinese Communist Party is the paramount authority," it said. "Communist Party members hold almost all top government and security apparatus positions."

Thus, corporations that do business with China are doing business with a Communist regime.

"Genocide and crimes against humanity occurred during the year against predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and members of other ethnic and religious minority groups in Xinjiang," said the State Department.

Thus, corporations that do business with China are doing business with a regime that is committing genocide.

"Significant human rights issues," said the State Department, "included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings by the government; forced disappearances by the government; torture by the government ... serious restrictions on free expression and media, including physical attacks on and criminal prosecution of journalists, lawyers, writers, bloggers, dissidents ..."

Thus, corporations that do business with China are doing business with a regime that attacks the freedom of speech.

"Moreover," the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom said in its own 2022 annual report, "authorities throughout China routinely raided churches, detained Christians, and confiscated religious materials. The government also continued to demolish church buildings and crosses — including the Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Xinjiang — under its 'sinicization of religion' campaign."

Thus, corporations that do business with China are doing business with a regime that attacks the freedom of religion.

This year's Annual Threat Assessment, published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, indicated that China is seeking "a world-class military that will enable it to ... project power globally while offsetting perceived U.S. military superiority."

"Beijing," says the assessment, "is accelerating the development of key capabilities it believes the People's Liberation Army (PLA) needs to confront the United States in a large-scale, sustained conflict."

China is developing not only its traditional military capability but also its cyber-sector capability.

"China almost certainly is capable of launching cyber attacks that would disrupt critical infrastructure services within the United States, including against oil and gas pipelines and rail systems," says the threat assessment.

"China will remain the top threat to U.S. technological competiveness as Beijing targets key sectors and proprietary commercial and military technology from U.S. and allied companies and institutions," says the assessment. "Beijing uses a variety of tools, from public investment to espionage to advance its technological capabilities.

"Beijing's willingness to use espionage, subsidies, and trade policy to give its firms a competitive advantage represents not just an ongoing challenge for the U.S. economy and its workers, but also advances Beijing's ability to assume leadership of the world's technological advancement and standards," says the threat assessment.

Our trade policies and practices are now sending Communist China — which commits genocide and attacks the freedoms of speech and religion — tens of billions of dollars every month.

Anyone with common sense realized that moving manufacturing of ALL sorts to that country or any other area to utilize low wages and extract maximum profit is a “cut your nose off to spite your face!” I am in the trades down here in Louisiana , I am a journeyman roofer and the owners of companies down here rotate crews (Mainly south of the border young men) who work hard but for nominal wages and this has ended up with no Americans learning this tough trade...perfect recipe for disaster which we all watch in agonizing slow motion...I am at wits end .

Same thing with the Energy industry. Think of all the wealth we have transferred to the Saudis and others when we have plenty of oil and know-how right here at home.

It’s by design and not out of greed or stupidity.

Of course, it’s not in the best interest of Americans.

I’ll leave it at that.

This is the work of America last Democrats and RINOs. The China Plague gave them an excuse to shut down businesses. Now Democrat policies keep them shut and make it difficult to start new American businesses. It is that simple.

Political agendas have become counter productive for the progressive movement. Adherents find themselves in conflict with national interests when they apply global principles.
This was the genius of Trump. He was able to be single minded and by so doing ramrodded a host of programs and policies beneficial to the US nation state. His MAGA slogan was more than mere words. It defined a direction and purpose for the country.
Biden has none of this. His team is beleaguered by its conviction that globalism is preferable to nationalism. This prevents them from acting in the nation’s best interest. In so doing they stand in opposition to the interests of every other nation. His administration has brought about a global crisis that is profoundly dangerous to the peace and well being of us all.
There are very powerful interests that oppose nationalism. Banks are chief among them. Global industrialists are another. Politicians who cater to the interests of globalists are losing constituency as economies worsen.
By this fall we will see a complete rout of globalists in US elections. Forcing the current administration out of office or, at a minimum, severely hamstringing the Biden administration, will be the top agenda item for the newly minted MAGA Congress.

Biden is driven by the IMF and other global interests. This includes multi nationals such as banks that do business with China. He will not relinquish those interests for the sake of humanitarian concerns. Nor will he relinquish China interests when they conflict with US interests.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.