What I object to is boys using the girls room.
This is what confused me also. Another horribly presented story by the media. What does "sports" have to do with the issue. It's like a 3rd grader forgot to include something in the story and mentioned something about sports in the story. Also, according to the judge and the statute sited, does this not also allow boys to use the girls restroom so as to avoid discrimination? Are the students required to humiliate themselves by declaring their preferred orientation before using the opposite (medically assigned) sex's restroom?
“What I object to is boys using the girls room.”
The problem is that the law already prohibits schools from sex-based discrimination. They can’t make a rule that prohibits boys but not girls, or that would be invalid because it is sexually discriminatory.
Boys using the girls’ restroom will go hand in hand with girls using the boys’ restroom.
Gender equity!
Isn’t it worse if one biological female uses a male bathroom (where the chances of more males at any given one time, is higher than the other way around)? I’m confused by your statement because you acknowledge the safety aspect.