Despite their biases, the fact checkers are correct but they are indicting the film for failing to prove a legally sufficient case when the film set out to make a compelling political and practical argument. One cannot look at the movie without drawing the conclusion that the shenanigans documented are so egregious that the vote count was unfair.
Rather than litigate every point it should be enough that every reasonable viewer would conclude that the election was stolen. For example, the fact checkers say that there is no evidence that the stuffed ballots were illegally dropped for Biden. Proving whom illegal ballots were cast for should not be required. It should be enough to know that improper ballots, even for unknown candidates, were counted in sufficient numbers to overturn the result. Therefore, the election should not stand because the process is so tainted that it loses legitimacy. The test is not whether the count is objectively reversed, the test is whether regular form was violated to an extent potentially sufficient to reverse the count.
Even if one accepts this contention, the problem of finding a court that would accept jurisdiction, that would acknowledge standing of the litigants, and one that would find that the remedy of setting aside the election is even available, is a very long shot.
Although it is unlikely that there will be any satisfactory legal ruling emerging nevertheless Dinesh D’Souza has rendered a very great service in pursuit of fair elections, voter motivation and fundraising.
This is a movie not a legal document and should be judged as such.
