To Hell with the nuances...
Some humans respect nascent life, others are scum. The female factor is irrelevant.
I think the stats show that a minority of women have the majority of abortions. There’s a problem there that isn’t related to abortion. The Left doesn’t want to tell them, look, you have to either cut down on your activities or use protection. Because, well, her body her choice, right? Essentially, the Left believes, perhaps correctly, that these women are too stupid to use protection. Or the Left gains their support on candidates by giving them the right to an abortion. In game theory, if you change the rules people change their behavior. If we change the rules to take away the option of an abortion, you’ll find that the need for abortions largely goes away.
In an example of how this works, Tallahassee set up a study at a couple of intersections and decided that if they set up cameras and issued tickets for people running lights, they’d make x millions. They set up the cameras and after an initial period they made no money because people knew the cameras were there and stopped running the lights. (There was a dramatic increase in rear end accidents and the city eventually removed the cameras.)
The reference to “Solomon’s wisdom” is ironic. Solomon had no intention of killing the baby in question. The woman who agreed to have the child cut in half to spurn her rival is clearly shown to be no mother at all. The true mother loved her baby enough that she would give him up rather than see him die. His aim was solely to demonstrate the true mother.