Yes, plenty. NATO countries, not just the USA, have nuclear weapons. Mostly sub launched, and those pesky British and French submarines aren’t wallowing, noisy whales like your Russian boats.
Don’t you think those sub commanders are going to be just a bit angry if London and Paris go away?
Would Russian nuclear weapons even work? They actually require a tremendous amount of periodic (almost constant) maintenance to keep them viable and a lot of money is required to do that. In the meantime, it’s not like they’re being used.
Suppose the officers in charge skimmed off some of those Rubles in order to extend the new Dacha, buy that Mercedes or that sleek Italian yacht? If they couldn’t even keep the armored tires from going flat, perhaps the nukes will just fizzle on the launch pad.
BTW, the USAF and USN know where your leadership’s hidey-holes are. They are marked for a new kind of bomb, launched by stealth aircraft that Russia can’t track, that penetrate underground bunkers.
See here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqnutvrmHRk&t=99s
See minute marker 1:28 through :34. That’s a deep strike bomb, going to go boom underground. The magnitude 10 earthquake’s going to end the Kremlin tyrants dreams quick.
I hate that this has to happen, but playing fast and loose with nuke talk is just bad, and Russians need to stop it.
Playing fast and loose with destroy Russia talk is just bad and Brandon’s kids need to stop it.
I’m not worried about Russia nuking our cities, as they have far more options to ‘send a message’, both involving nukes and not involving nukes. I’m confident that the West will get the message before cities end up fried.
The problem, though, is once The West is shown to be defeated, how will it stand up to China (i.e., the real threat to the world)?
stealth aircraft that Russia can’t track
—
Known stealth aircraft as they pass through the radio spectrum leave a detectable ‘hole’ and can be tracked.