Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Air Force Tests New Ship-Sinking Bomb in Gulf of Mexico
gCaptain ^ | May 3, 2022 | Mike Schuler

Posted on 05/03/2022 7:24:32 PM PDT by artichokegrower

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: artichokegrower
I think naval surface warfare has run its course. There are too many inexpensive effective weapons that are capable of sinking an entire fleet in minutes.

This however, seems a much less effective system than the upgraded harpoon types. I don't see much strategic difference in a warship sinking in 1 minute vs 4 hours. Standoff range is king in this arena.

41 posted on 05/04/2022 5:48:31 AM PDT by Damifino (The true measure of a man is found in what he would do if he knew no one would ever find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella

“a long range gliding guided bomb that can do evasive actions on it’s way in

Not the bomb, the launching aircraft. It has to be somewhat stable during the weapon release. Sitting duck if inside the air defense missile zone.


42 posted on 05/04/2022 6:33:45 AM PDT by doorgunner69 (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

“This is conventional warfare, not nuclear.”

I understand that completely, but if you can’t take a ship out without it getting sunk you’re going to stop taking ships out. It’s the same thing your destruction is assured.


43 posted on 05/04/2022 7:24:18 AM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, bust that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl99
This seems to me to be a difficult antiship weapon to defend against...

I agree!

IMHO, the only defense is to shoot down the delivery aircraft before weapon release.

In addition, the cost to manufacture would be relatively cheap. Perhaps, we could manufacture 100 of these JDAMs for the same cost of one Harpoon.

My hope is that Taiwan already has several thousand of these in their WRM.

44 posted on 05/04/2022 7:41:43 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin

I understand that completely, but
***I think you do not understand it completely... as follows...

if you can’t take a ship out without it getting sunk you’re going to stop taking ships out.
***Like the Muskva before it sank... as an example....

It’s the same thing your destruction is assured.
***No it is not. You took the ship out to the point it has to be towed back to port to be repaired. It is no longer an offensive weapon. How does that add up to MAD? It does not.


45 posted on 05/04/2022 8:05:07 AM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I understand completely.


46 posted on 05/04/2022 9:47:52 AM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, bust that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin

That is your claim. Your claim is unsupported by facts.


47 posted on 05/04/2022 3:34:05 PM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

What is the difference between mutually assured destruction and ships that are not deployed because it will be assuredly destroyed?

I’m asking you. What is the difference?


48 posted on 05/04/2022 3:42:18 PM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, bust that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1

Thinking Old tech, new label ...... create a big bubble under a big boat and break it in half . Down it goes ......


49 posted on 05/04/2022 10:49:07 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson