Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

Some responses to Harris:

1. Harris says she can’t think of any laws that affect men’s choices about their bodies? The draft laws seem to refute her.

2. In the law, if I were to pick up a baby, whether mine or another’s, I cannot then just let the baby fall to the ground if I decided it was too heavy to carry. I have forfeited my right to do with my body whatever I wish until I can get that child to a place of safety before dropping my tired arms. Roe versus Wade changed that rule by saying the baby was not a baby until after it was born. The safety principle needs to be re-instated. No one forces a woman to assume an 18-year term of servitude when she can give the child up for adoption.

3. Finally, does Harris and Company not realize we are right now paying the price for their selfishness? Do they really believe it is a coincidence that the generation which was permitted to be born only if it was convenient to the mother now considers the lives of others cheap and disposable based on their own ideas of convenience? We sowed the wind and are reaping the whirlwind until we can again establish the value of life to all people.


7 posted on 05/03/2022 5:23:47 PM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: caseinpoint

In addition, Drivers Laws in every state regulate men’s and women’s bodies:

How they harness themselves in

How heavily their foot can press on the gas pedal

What their hands may hold...cellphones, etc.


19 posted on 05/03/2022 7:53:10 PM PDT by miserare ( Respect for life--life of all kinds-- is the first principle of civilization.~~A. Schweitzer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson