It's ok to overthrow democracy when the left does it.
1 posted on
05/03/2022 9:20:48 AM PDT by
fruser1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: fruser1
'To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the Court will not be affected in any way,' Roberts wrote in a Tuesday morning statement. I wonder how long his nose grew after that statement...
2 posted on
05/03/2022 9:22:13 AM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(Fauci is a despicable little turd)
To: fruser1
Oh boy. Another Investigation.
Let’s put Durham on it.
L
3 posted on
05/03/2022 9:23:13 AM PDT by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: fruser1
Roberts said that though the document was authentic, it does not represent the 'final decision' of any members of the court.Meaning, when they see the Left go nuts and burn things down, they'll back off and get one of the wishy-washy judges to vote with the Leftist judges.
4 posted on
05/03/2022 9:23:29 AM PDT by
Alas Babylon!
(Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
To: fruser1
To: fruser1
“it is NOT the Supreme Court’s final decision”
Well isn’t that the reason for the leak, to change the courts mind?....among other motivations.
6 posted on
05/03/2022 9:23:52 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
To: fruser1
Roberts will do all in his power to see that Roe is NOT overturned. Whoever has the dirt on Roberts has issued marching orders.
7 posted on
05/03/2022 9:23:56 AM PDT by
brownsfan
(It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
To: fruser1
Anyone else not trust that weasel as far as they could throw him?
(or less)
9 posted on
05/03/2022 9:25:01 AM PDT by
tomkat
( SOTU = FUBAR )
To: fruser1
10 posted on
05/03/2022 9:25:21 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: fruser1
Note that Thomas hasn’t confirmed this.
11 posted on
05/03/2022 9:25:37 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
To: fruser1
Epstein island visitor to the rescue! PUKE!!!!!
13 posted on
05/03/2022 9:26:01 AM PDT by
bantam
To: fruser1
If it was a low level staffer, the FedGov worker’s union will be working overtime to prevent that person from being fired.
15 posted on
05/03/2022 9:26:35 AM PDT by
shotgun
To: fruser1
The work of the Court will not be affected in any way, I'm sure Roberts doesn't even believe that.
To: fruser1
Roberts: Legal decisions based not on principles and law but at the end of pitchforks and torches. America 2022.
19 posted on
05/03/2022 9:27:14 AM PDT by
llevrok
(Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
To: fruser1
You can bet that some insurrections are totally awesome when the left does it..that they will burn down cities and threaten Supreme Court families lives in order for a few of them to reverse their decision
To: fruser1
Too late. The damage is done.
And whoever did it, if he or she is discovered, will be a hero to the left, and will be celebrated as a savior, and will get major contracts with a TV station of his/her choice, and will write a book that will earn him/her millions.
The only thing that will hurt, if it does, is that, the leak came out 190 or so days before the elections, which means that, most people will have forgotten about the issue by then. People have short memories.
22 posted on
05/03/2022 9:27:38 AM PDT by
adorno
To: fruser1
‘To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the Court will not be affected in any way,’
***It already has. SCOTUS has no integrity.
23 posted on
05/03/2022 9:27:43 AM PDT by
Kevmo
(Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
To: fruser1
Roberts said that though the document was authentic, it does not represent the 'final decision' of any members of the court.Roberts according to the memo, did not say this.
24 posted on
05/03/2022 9:27:50 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(I will not do business with fascists)
To: fruser1
Would this be considered an insurrection? Leak followed by angry, threatening mobs attempting to intimidate the Supreme Court. I guess not, because it’s a Media-Dem Party operation.
25 posted on
05/03/2022 9:27:56 AM PDT by
euram
To: fruser1
Thomas -- "this is not going to affect the outcome of the decision, correct?"
To: fruser1
“The work of the Court will not be affected in any way,’ Roberts wrote...”
Traitor Roberts lies [again].
Of course there will be effects.
SCOTUS better release the opinion extremely soon before someone gets their mind changed.
30 posted on
05/03/2022 9:30:11 AM PDT by
Paladin2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson