Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's ok to overthrow democracy when the left does it.
1 posted on 05/03/2022 9:20:48 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: fruser1
'To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the Court will not be affected in any way,' Roberts wrote in a Tuesday morning statement.

I wonder how long his nose grew after that statement...

2 posted on 05/03/2022 9:22:13 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fauci is a despicable little turd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Oh boy. Another Investigation.

Let’s put Durham on it.

L


3 posted on 05/03/2022 9:23:13 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
Roberts said that though the document was authentic, it does not represent the 'final decision' of any members of the court.

Meaning, when they see the Left go nuts and burn things down, they'll back off and get one of the wishy-washy judges to vote with the Leftist judges.

4 posted on 05/03/2022 9:23:29 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Roberts was the leak...


5 posted on 05/03/2022 9:23:44 AM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

“it is NOT the Supreme Court’s final decision”

Well isn’t that the reason for the leak, to change the courts mind?....among other motivations.


6 posted on 05/03/2022 9:23:52 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Roberts will do all in his power to see that Roe is NOT overturned. Whoever has the dirt on Roberts has issued marching orders.


7 posted on 05/03/2022 9:23:56 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
Anyone else not trust that weasel as far as they could throw him?

(or less)

9 posted on 05/03/2022 9:25:01 AM PDT by tomkat ( SOTU = FUBAR )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Roberts is a SNAKE!


10 posted on 05/03/2022 9:25:21 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Note that Thomas hasn’t confirmed this.


11 posted on 05/03/2022 9:25:37 AM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Epstein island visitor to the rescue! PUKE!!!!!


13 posted on 05/03/2022 9:26:01 AM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

If it was a low level staffer, the FedGov worker’s union will be working overtime to prevent that person from being fired.


15 posted on 05/03/2022 9:26:35 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
The work of the Court will not be affected in any way,

I'm sure Roberts doesn't even believe that.

18 posted on 05/03/2022 9:26:54 AM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Roberts: Legal decisions based not on principles and law but at the end of pitchforks and torches. America 2022.


19 posted on 05/03/2022 9:27:14 AM PDT by llevrok (Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

You can bet that some insurrections are totally awesome when the left does it..that they will burn down cities and threaten Supreme Court families lives in order for a few of them to reverse their decision


21 posted on 05/03/2022 9:27:33 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Too late. The damage is done.

And whoever did it, if he or she is discovered, will be a hero to the left, and will be celebrated as a savior, and will get major contracts with a TV station of his/her choice, and will write a book that will earn him/her millions.

The only thing that will hurt, if it does, is that, the leak came out 190 or so days before the elections, which means that, most people will have forgotten about the issue by then. People have short memories.


22 posted on 05/03/2022 9:27:38 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

‘To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the Court will not be affected in any way,’
***It already has. SCOTUS has no integrity.


23 posted on 05/03/2022 9:27:43 AM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
Roberts said that though the document was authentic, it does not represent the 'final decision' of any members of the court.

Roberts according to the memo, did not say this.

24 posted on 05/03/2022 9:27:50 AM PDT by frogjerk (I will not do business with fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Would this be considered an insurrection? Leak followed by angry, threatening mobs attempting to intimidate the Supreme Court. I guess not, because it’s a Media-Dem Party operation.


25 posted on 05/03/2022 9:27:56 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
Thomas -- "this is not going to affect the outcome of the decision, correct?"


26 posted on 05/03/2022 9:28:06 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

“The work of the Court will not be affected in any way,’ Roberts wrote...”

Traitor Roberts lies [again].

Of course there will be effects.

SCOTUS better release the opinion extremely soon before someone gets their mind changed.


30 posted on 05/03/2022 9:30:11 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson