The law is the law, and I support the rule of law. It’s determined by legislatures and signed into law by the executives. Prosecuting people for violating a “law” not passed by any legislature at the time of violation is unconstitutional. If they would pass such a law, I would support it, and the prosecution of violators. If a lawyer were caught in this violation of legal ethics, I would support his/her disbarment, and he and anyone who was implicated in the violation being publicly outed so he/she can never work for so much as a traffic judge in Podunk, MO, ever again. This/these a@@hole(s) should be a pariah coast to coast. But you don’t jail people for a crime that is not enacted, anymore than you keep people in solitary for 18 months for taking selfies in the corridors of the Capitol.
Unfortunately, the disbarred lawyer, after exposure, will be lionized and get a book deal and talk show appearances out of it, and get a job with some leftard organization paying a six figure salary. But there is no way to prosecute.
Your misconceptions of grammar should be corrected.
You are the subject, “making” is the verb, “the point” is the object, but “whomever leaked this” is a subordinate clause in which the leaker is the subject, “leaked” is the verb and “this” is the object. So “whoever leaked this” is the proper usage. It’s a quibble, but grammar is grammar.
Thanks for the lessons in grammar and pomposity.