Replies

Sorry, you pressed my button by seeming to refute a scientific study

I don't refute scientific studies. But, the one in question is JUST ONE study, and limited at that.

Perhaps you know of other studies like the one above that proves the effectiveness of vitamin D? Or perhaps just another one with a larger sample of subjects?

There are far too many studies which people will jump on, because, they prove what you want to hear. For example, when it comes to global-warming/climate-change, democrats like to use ONLY the studies that prove their points, while ignoring every other study that proves otherwise.

Science is about proof, and proof is not just one study. Did I press more of your buttons?

Plenty of information showing that having adequate Vitamin D levels PRIOR to infection results in lower risk of infection and lower risk of severe or fatal outcome.

It’s not a therapy , it’s a prophylactic. Apparently it will remain a top secret one, and there’s not much I can do about that.

I don’t care what you think, especially now that I know you have nothing useful to add.

Have a pleasant evening, and I won’t bother reading any reply you might have.