No where in the article does it print the boy’s age. Typical low-grade reporting. If we’re talking about a 17 year-old, my guess is that he was part of the Burn-Loot-Murder troops. If he was 10, why the hell would you take him to a riot?
Another article gives the boys age as 7 at the time of the incident.
“No where in the article does it print the boy’s age.”
In a statement on KOMO news, Seattle, he was said to be 7 yeaars old.
wy69
I noticed that his age isn’t mentioned too. To the media “boy” could be in his 20’s, if it fits their agenda. I put nothing past them.