Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Will Be Years Before Raytheon Can Build New Stinger Missiles
https://www.defenseone.com/business/2022/04/it-will-be-years-raytheon-can-build-new-stinger-missiles/366105/ ^

Posted on 04/28/2022 5:27:00 AM PDT by FarCenter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: lurk

Although MANPADS production was originally limited to a few states, including the U.S., U.K., Russia and China, today over 30 countries manufacture MANPADS. Major MANPADS producing states today include China, France, Russia, Sweden, the U.K. and the U.S. The most commonly produced MANPADS are the Soviet SA-7 and the U.S. Stinger.

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/manpads


41 posted on 04/28/2022 9:08:18 AM PDT by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

and please let the Ukrianians pay for this !


42 posted on 04/28/2022 9:30:22 AM PDT by CarolinaReaganFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phoenix8

Nope - we gave our antiquated Stingers away without:

1) having invested in a newer design
2) having selected a replacement
3) having the production capacity to produce the existing stingers
4) having the production capacity to produce the replacement
5) having the ability to convert other missiles as a stopgap

So yeah, another BRILLIANT decision by Biden


43 posted on 04/28/2022 9:52:52 AM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

The Biden Clown World is so stupid it burns.


44 posted on 04/28/2022 9:54:29 AM PDT by Vision (Elections are one day. Reject "Chicago" vote harvesting. Election Reform Now. Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

That’s what we thought when the cold war ended, and we have made virtually zero effort on short and medium range air defenses for the Army. Everything was put into ballistic missile defense with THAAD and Patriot. About 10 years ago, we realized that the proliferation of drones and cruise missiles has changed everything, yet we are still slow to react and still haven’t filled the gap between the stinger and Patriot. You can’t fight off a large number of combat drones and/or cruise missiles with a limited number of incredibly expensive Patriot missiles, a mission they are not very effective for. You will quickly empty your launchers and have almost no air defense. We need an updated system to replace the stinger (in progress), and a short-medium range system like Norway’s NASAMS (which is based on our AIM-120 AMRAAM) to protect ground assets.

Our ground forces need coverage like the Navy: CIWS> RAM> ESSM> SM-2> SM-6> SM-3. We have plans in motion to fill these holes, and they should be pretty amazing when fielded in a few years. But for now, we have significant holes in our air defense game.


45 posted on 04/28/2022 1:12:17 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson