Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fuente
John Ratcliffe was the DCI. He didn't - and doesn't - have the legal authority to indict anyone. And he was the only one of Trump's DCI's to do anything in terms of the documents, and he was in office for less than 8 months.

Trump was literally the only guy who had the authority to declassify stuff immediately, and he could have declassified all this stuff. He just didn't.

That's on him.

19 posted on 04/24/2022 9:21:49 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Trump must be addicted to breathing.

He couldn't even fully declassify the JFK material - that's when he knew what he was up against.

Remember, assassination works.

25 posted on 04/24/2022 9:29:07 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Enjoy your radioactive roots and berries!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I think Ric Grenell declassified documents as well. Trump may have been advised not to declassify them because the documents could/would be used by Durham in his investigation and indictments.


33 posted on 04/24/2022 9:38:27 AM PDT by vivenne (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
" Trump was literally the only guy who had the authority to declassify stuff immediately, and he could have declassified all this stuff. He just didn't. That's on him."

This is the one criticism of Trump's 1st term that I can agree with. After that first bogus Impeachment, President Trump simply should have signed an EO unmasking every governmental communication from the top 10 in presidential succession "In order to prevent an internal, post-impeachment coup which is underway, and will threaten the very foundation of our American way of life.".

Trump would have had the cover to do this, with 8 of 10 from his own party, as the only Marxists in the top 10 at the time would have been Nanzi and Leahy.

But make it a fait accompli. Have the comms in hand, pull quote the 3 worst ones, then take those 3 straight to the American public.

If Trump or anyone would have been successful in unmasking Nanzi's comms, her ice cream would melt, it would have been Wikileaks on steroids, and J6 would have looked like a Sunday picnic in comparison -- more to the point, J6 would have never happened, because it would not have to have happened, and China would have been forced to either release their bioweapon on the spot, or put it back in the fridge for Trump's 2nd term.

When Rudy was asked this. specific. question. on Bannon about a year ago -- why didn't you simply unmask them? -- Rudy fudged the answer hard for half a minute, finally under pressure from Steve (who did not ask the question rhetorically but had framed the question with solemn seriousness, steering his entire line of questioning to what was, at that time, the ridiculous leaking out of the WH, courtesy of Deep State plants), Rudy finally said, "Several reasons we just couldn't do that...", and did not elaborate. Which is bs.

Frankly, I'd like someone like Rogan to put Rudy's favorite brand in his green room and on interview, approach the exact same question the exact same way. I think Rudy might give it up.

42 posted on 04/24/2022 1:07:24 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson