Posted on 04/23/2022 4:05:14 PM PDT by libh8er
Rogozin said in an interview with Russian state TV that the missiles would be deployed with a unit in the Krasnoyarsk region of Siberia, about 1,860 miles east of Moscow. He said they would be placed at the same sites and in the same silos as the Soviet-era Voyevoda missiles they are replacing, something that would save 'colossal resources and time'.
The Sarmat missile is said to be the world's longest-range intercontinental ballistic missile, capable of striking a target 11,200 miles away - meaning it could easily strike targets in the US and Europe.
Western military experts said the Sarmat is capable of carrying 10 or more nuclear warheads and decoys - easily enough to wipe out territories the size of Britain or France in a single strike.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Sarmat’s MIRVs are now deployed using the Avangarde Hypersonic sleds therefore making them hypersonic cruise missiles. We better be able to get this before it deploys them or its no dice as there is no way to intercept and shoot down anything that is hypersonic.
Don’t worry Christian warrior Putin will only aim this at Nazis.
/s
When someone aims a deadly weapon at my family, I want to see that miserable dog suffer and die.
With Brandon, Harris, Austin and Milley in charge, are you absolutely SURE ours are at the ready?
These days, it is easy to really wonder...
Maybe ours are "standing" ready, but are the current decision makers "standing" ready to fire them?
Of course, that question excludes our communist masters from standing ready to use them on "red" states & counties...
As some of them have stated...
The Vatican can watch the Satan missiles with their Lucifer telescope
Great movie and totally under appreciated!
Britain better watch their step and quit arming the Ukes.
To the USA and especially all the Biden Boys and girls on this site - jump if you feel froggy. F around and find out
I’m sure there will be massive demonstrations across Russia, taking their government to task for threatening another country with horrifying nuclear weapons that can destroy all life on Earth.
Remember when Obama said we could 'absorb' a first strike? Since he is probably the one pulling the strings you should feel very confident!
Don’t they have any Bal bombs or demon demolition to deploy? 🤪
.......I think Pooty is blowing more snot on this one. Why would you pinpoint the exact location of an ICBM long range nuclear missile!
This is an attempt to intimidate Boris Johnson and the Rooskies are mad at him for sinking their old worn out Moskva.
“Sarmat’s MIRVs are now deployed using the Avangarde Hypersonic sleds therefore making them hypersonic cruise missiles. We better be able to get this before it deploys them or its no dice as there is no way to intercept and shoot down anything that is hypersonic.”
All ICBMs are hypersonic, with reentry speeds in the 15000-18000 mph range. That’s why a “Star Wars” type ABM system is so difficult to design and implement.
nuclear
/\
It’s not a nuke.
It’s the world’s biggest MRV fuel air bomb
that has the blast effect of a Hiroshima size explosion.
Leaves no radiation,,
and can’t be considered a nuke cuz it’s not.
Only equal response we have is nuke,
but if we throw a nuke back, it gives them cause to go nuke too.
I think TalyBiden admin would take the hit
, not retaliate,
just to kick America in the nuts while we’re down.
Hell, knowing dementia Joe he will surrender,,,
,,. to China.
/-)
!!!
I totally forgot about that
Still,
MUTINY milley would probably call China for permision to use them.
The article was talking about nuclear weapons, and Putin has been threatening with nuclear weapons.
I give Putin’s ICBM fleet as much success as his armor units have had this last month.
In other words it’s a big propane bomb
The UK subs as ours and France can totally destroy Russia as can they us. Nuclear warfare is a lose lose game on both sides. In relationship to non nuclear warfare Russia has demonstrated themselves as inferior and this surprised me.
Nato would destroy them in conventional warfare. If it went nuclear we all die.
Given that Ukraine lost about 2500 pieces of armor, exhausted most of the NATO ATGM and MANPAD arsenal sent to it and still failed to mount a single counter-offensive, I wouldn’t be so sure about the conventional part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.