Skip to comments.
Official: Meadows had been warned of possible 1/6 violence
Abcnews ^
| 04/23/2022
| FARNOUSH AMIRI, ERIC TUCKER and MARY CLARE JALONICK
Posted on 04/23/2022 9:44:34 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Possible??? 🙄🙄
To: ChicagoConservative27
2
posted on
04/23/2022 9:48:32 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: ChicagoConservative27
It was unclear what Meadows did with that information. Enough said. FAKE NEWS.
3
posted on
04/23/2022 9:49:05 AM PDT
by
stars & stripes forever
(Blessed the nation whose GOD is the LORD. ~ Psalm 33:12)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Took THREE people to write this tripe?
4
posted on
04/23/2022 9:51:54 AM PDT
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
To: ChicagoConservative27
And Trump asked for National Guard which Pelosi REFUSED so whose at fault here..I know I know
To: ChicagoConservative27
A former White House official told the House committee investigating the Capitol riot that President Donald Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, had been advised of intelligence reports showing the potential for violence
Such nonsense!
The potential for violence exists whenever there is a gathering of people, at stadiums, at protests, in church, at the beach or pool, at political meetings, at the home or office, at a bar or restaurant, at a congressional meeting, in fact, anywhere anytime there are more than one person.
But, people always want to enhance the potential for violence when it concerns Trump or a conservative. Like I said, pure nonsense.
6
posted on
04/23/2022 9:52:08 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: ChicagoConservative27
“Mark Meadows, had been advised of intelligence reports showing the potential for violence,”
Translation: FBI and CIA were monitoring everything carefully for signs of a counterrevolution to undo the coup/steal of election 2020.
7
posted on
04/23/2022 9:52:22 AM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
To: ChicagoConservative27
As had Nanny Pelosi. what did she do about it?
8
posted on
04/23/2022 9:52:32 AM PDT
by
moonhawk
(Biden: Not my President. Fauci: not my doctor. Me: not their bitch. You:???)
To: ChicagoConservative27
I want to know why Nancy forbade all the standard law enforcement presence that all other large DC gatherings routinely received, and why she turned down President Trump’s request of the National Guard to be present.
9
posted on
04/23/2022 9:52:36 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Humans live on 1/4th of what they eat; on the last 3/4ths lives their doctor. --Egyptian Inscription)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Yeah, the capitol police killed two women
10
posted on
04/23/2022 9:52:55 AM PDT
by
struggle
To: Nifster
And President Trump requested the national guard.
Who turned the request down?
If the Soviet 1/6 commitee had even an ounce of legitimacy they would be asking that question.
11
posted on
04/23/2022 9:53:21 AM PDT
by
Tolk2112
To: ChicagoConservative27
I wish this little chipmonk would choke on a nut. His opinions are worthless.
12
posted on
04/23/2022 9:54:58 AM PDT
by
scottiemom
(As a retired Texas public school teacher, I highly recommend private school. (Written in 2015))
To: ChicagoConservative27
Why didn’t Pelosi and Bowser accept Trump’s offer of National Guard troops? Maybe that should be investigated. It’s interesting that after the election there were at least 2 massive pro-Trump rallies in DC (prior to the one on January 6th), involving 200,000 or more people. The ONLY violence during those events was when Black Lies Matter and Antifa thugs attacked rally-goers who were heading back to their hotels, and those who had stopped to get something to eat. Bowser, Capitol Police, DC Police, Secret Service, FBI, all knew about that violence. Why wasn’t there more security at the Capitol on January 6th? The Media-Dem Party wanted the ability to weaponize any disturbances that day, we know that for sure.
13
posted on
04/23/2022 9:55:15 AM PDT
by
euram
To: ChicagoConservative27
There are concerns of violence for every single public gathering, especially political gatherings.
14
posted on
04/23/2022 9:55:41 AM PDT
by
EEGator
To: ChicagoConservative27
FARNOUSH AMIRI - “Allah Akbar”. AllBullCrap’s mullah minions. Presumed to be lying through their teeth.
15
posted on
04/23/2022 9:59:31 AM PDT
by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: Sarah Barracuda
Trump recommended that 10k National Guard troops be deployed on Jan 6th to the Capital.
Pelosi turned down the offer because she thought it was “bad optics”.
In typical Trump fashion he did not take the action on his own as he viewed it as the responsibility of Pelosi so he left the decision with her.
These are well known FACTS unless you only listen to the MSM.
Pelosi dropped the ball. The left wants to destroy Trump in any way possible.
Here we are..... the farcical Jan 6th Commission which will never conduct any introspection as to what “they” did or did not do that contributed to the chaos.
16
posted on
04/23/2022 10:01:13 AM PDT
by
volunbeer
(Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
To: ChicagoConservative27
“President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, had been advised of intelligence reports showing the potential for violence”
The potential for violence exists everyday everywhere.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Hmmm. OMG! Busted!
So who in the FBI that had numerous agents embedded in the crowd that day at the Capital because THEY suspected violence, told Meadows?
18
posted on
04/23/2022 10:04:42 AM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(GoFundMe is a Democrat Scam)
To: ChicagoConservative27
but it was unclear what Meadows did with that information. What did Pelosi do with it? It was her job.
19
posted on
04/23/2022 10:06:38 AM PDT
by
MileHi
((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Unarmed Americans protesting in DC?
20
posted on
04/23/2022 10:07:41 AM PDT
by
petitfour
(APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson