Replies

I criticize one side, because all of the articles are one sided.
***Horse manure. Go ahead and post your favorite TASS articles.

What are you babbling about non proliferation?
***The Budapest Accession to the United Nations Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty that the presidents of USA, Russia, and Ukraine signed. The Ukes HONORED it; the Rukes VIOLATED it twice by invading; and the USA is listening to wanker wussie appeasers who want to ABROGATE it.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4044080/posts

Who’s creating and spreading nuclear weapons?
***Every country on the planet which has the capability and now no longer trusts the USA to its commitment towards nuke nonproliferation, due to your ilk.

I’m a liar?
***Yes.

I’m impressed that you can read minds.
***I simply read your own post on one thread and pointed out that it contradicts with your own position. Plus, your previous posts on this subject are very putinista.

The nukes were never the Ukraine’s, they were just stationed there.
***See? That’s a very Putinist position to take. The weapons grade nuke material was abandoned by the soviets. Hence the need for the denuking agreement.

Are you concerned about the African conflicts currently happening?
***Red herring. Did those African nations sign a nuclear nonproliferation agreement assuring borders in exchange for giving up nukes? Nope. Call me when that happens.

Should we go to war there as well?
***If they’re killing Americans, yes. My emBASEee strategee. from my home page

I have been advocating for several years a policy I call ‘embaseees’. Embassy + AirBase —> EmBASEeees. We go into a terrorist country, clear out their taliban equivalent, then withdraw to very large Embassies, perhaps 3 of them. Have them big enough to encompass a military airbase where we can use it for decades on end to conduct anti-terrorism operations. As long as the ‘host’ country aint killing Americans then we let them have self-sovereignty. Kind of like how we operated in the Phillipines for decades. We could even have an intermediate zone that we patrol but it would be autonomous. Let them have their taste of freedom. A referendum every 10 years to see how large the boundaries of the intermediate autonomous zone should be.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4043681/posts

___________________________________________________________________

How about the border conflicts in South America?
***EmBASEee strategee.

China and their treatment of Uighurs?
***If we can, and if they’re killing Americans and it’s America Firsty, then yes. emBASEee strategee.

Is there anywhere you don’t want to go to war?
***Wherever they’re not killing Americans. But wait, this whole thing was just a gigantic red herring argument, typical of... you guessed it, Putinistas. Like yourself.

What branch did you serve in?
***Red herring. What branch were you section 8’d out of?

Constellis, formerly BlackWater, is hiring mercenaries.
***Cool. I hope they secure democracy wherever they see red herrings such as yours.

Why don’t you sign up?
***I will go. Just set up a gofundme account so I can spend YOUR money, I can’t afford it. I’ll join the Nuke suitcase nuke program and post regular updates about how your money is spent. Where can YOU go to sign up to be a pantywaist appeaser, hmmmm?