Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: erlayman
What does one have to do with the other? Banning Trophy hunting will decrease poaching, is that what you are saying? Or are you deliberately ignoring the salient point made that trophy hunting is only allowed for menace animals to support your opinion? In Webster's, your last post is featured for the definition of "strawman argument".

Here's a hypothetical. Lets say a Grizzly is menacing the livestock and family on your property. You have exhausted all means of humanely deterring it. It is, however, listed as endangered, and the local branch of the Interior dept. refuses to relocate or let you shoot it. Would you not want the right to be able to protect you and yours without fear of penalty and/or prosecution? Maybe, just maybe, your opinion is rooted in class hate. Damn rich people and their trophies.

30 posted on 04/21/2022 6:00:24 AM PDT by cport (How can political capital be spent on a bunch of ingrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: cport

Menace animals ? Trophy hunting selectively eliminates the oldest, most genetically fit elephants from the population because they have the largest tusks. Support the closure of domestic markets for elephant ivory worldwide, then we will talk about the role of sustainable use in promoting conservation.


32 posted on 04/21/2022 6:15:38 AM PDT by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson