Skip to comments.
Florida Senate Passes Bill to Eliminate Disney’s Special Tax District
WSJ ^
| Updated April 20, 2022 1:24 pm ET
| By Arian Campo-Flores
Posted on 04/20/2022 11:10:48 AM PDT by conservative98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: conservative98
I can understand a special tax status in 1967, when Disney World was being but that was over 50 years ago.
To: MercyFlush
Take a look at Disney’s institutional ownership.
I don’t think Disney taking it in the shorts will bother them.
42
posted on
04/20/2022 12:07:23 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
To: mewzilla
I agree. But it’s still nice to see them take a hit.
43
posted on
04/20/2022 12:08:15 PM PDT
by
MercyFlush
(The Soviet Empire is right now doing a dead cat bounce.)
To: PGR88
“Certainly, in my view, politically activist woke companies deserve push-back, but we don't like it when Conservative big business (are there any left?) suffer similar at the hands of awful leftist governors.”
If the South had won, we might still be fighting using the rules of gentlemen.
As is, it is time to go all Abraham Lincoln on them: invade and destroy. Treat the big Disney compound as a conquered territory.
To: conservative98; JulieRNR21; Travis McGee; AAABEST; kinganamort; katherineisgreat; floriduh voter; ..
Double-w00T!
Florida Freeper
I'm compiling a list of FReepers interested in Florida-related topics.
If you want to be added, please FReepMail me.
45
posted on
04/20/2022 12:10:39 PM PDT
by
Joe Brower
("Might we not live in a nobler dream than this?" -- John Ruskin)
To: conservative98
No matter how this plays out. Disney law suits, etc. It is absolutely the last thing a board of directors with any integrity would want to see engulfing the time and attention of management. As opposed to say . . . growth and profits and customer brand satisfaction, or new markets. Yeah. fight a convoluted state tax court battle, that’s the ticket! Surely totally worth it.
46
posted on
04/20/2022 12:11:54 PM PDT
by
Strident
(< null >)
To: dennisw
47
posted on
04/20/2022 12:12:56 PM PDT
by
citizen
(Thieves of private property pass their lives in chains; thieves of public prop. in riches and luxury)
To: conservative98
On Wednesday, Disney declined to comment on the bill Oh--so now they decline to comment....
48
posted on
04/20/2022 12:13:55 PM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
To: conservative98
49
posted on
04/20/2022 12:18:09 PM PDT
by
datura
(Eventually, the Lord and the Truth will win.)
To: conservative98
Wow. This is way effingoverdue
50
posted on
04/20/2022 12:19:32 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security in hates:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: jdsteel
Id put it in a fund to pursue pedos and groomers for sake of language, in case libs did not understand
51
posted on
04/20/2022 12:20:22 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security in hates:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: PGR88
It should be at the discretion of the states. States and local governments give tax incentives and enticements to to companies to move their businesses to their states and cities.
It is the prerogative of the states and cities to revoke those special tax incentives at any time and for any reason. And it is the prerogative of the business to move elsewhere if they don't like it.
52
posted on
04/20/2022 12:21:07 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: Nashcash
Yes. I hope he runs
53
posted on
04/20/2022 12:24:44 PM PDT
by
bella1
(DeSantis 2024)
To: PGR88
I am not allowed to exempt my property from fees and regulations by saying “Well, I only use my own resources!”
No company should either.
I can’t buy a new full auto rifle. Local security and PMC’s do all the time.
We decided to make companies “person’s” under the law, yet give those persons special rights and protections.
If I steal or kill someone, I go to jail. Does a large company get shut down (as in all assets seized) for the same?
54
posted on
04/20/2022 12:30:17 PM PDT
by
redgolum
(If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
To: dennisw
We treat streaming services like all subscription services — once it is no longer useful to us, we cancel. Sort of a hit and run approach or run and hit and run again. With all of the woke crap, it simply shortens the time til we cancel again.
We have used all of the major streaming services at one time or another including Disney +.
Heck, we could start and cancel within one month if there is only one show or movie that we are interested in. Easy peasy.
They have no loyalty to us so why should we to them?
And if we are lucky we can get in on some promotional discount which is usually the case if we haven't subscribed for a few months. Lol. :)
We can play the game too.
55
posted on
04/20/2022 12:30:40 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...
56
posted on
04/20/2022 12:41:04 PM PDT
by
bitt
( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
To: MercyFlush
57
posted on
04/20/2022 12:42:29 PM PDT
by
bitt
( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
To: conservative98
Disney may come to regret picking this fight over that law.
They may live to regret picking fights with DeSantis. We’ll see.
To: conservative98
Time for them to pay their fair share
To: Reno89519
Well I could tell you one advantage; it would no longer be a pedo’s Paradise that can investigate itself outside police would now be able to come in and investigate.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson