But I thought a Neptune Missile based only upon it's name would be launched from underwater.
(unless from our Space Force, of course of course)
The Nomad is a really nice background prop.
Posted on 04/15/2022 2:52:57 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
Ukraine ping
Ukrainian sources have suggested that the Moskva might have carried nuclear cruise missiles. In addition, based on imagery of the parking lot whence the sailors departed, the vast majority of the Moskva’s complement may have gone down with the ship.
Who made the missile?
That is the big question.
Don’t bother asking Russia about it. Whatever they say will be a lie.
L
They are never, ever going to admit that nuclear warheads are on a surface combatant. The Daily Mail is always questionable in its reporting.
Neptune missiles are a Ukrainian product.
L
Cool.
Whatever sunk that ship we can all agree it’s out of action and off the table.
I’d also say it’s safe to say the Russian navy is no longer a factor in this war.
Moreover, the remaining Russian ships are now likely to be swiftly destroyed if they leave the safety of their port defenses.
“...in what would be a bitter loss for Vladimir Putin’s already beleaguered army.”
Not to mention the NAVY to whom they belonged.
Are you sure it was a Neptune missile?
I know that is what is reported, but are we sure?
Meanwhile, Russia is starting to send it’s bombers in. Which is odd that it took this long. The war maybe entering the terror bombing stage.
A few seconds closer to nuclear midnight.
“Who made the missile?”
The Neptune missiles are Ukrainian made variants of the Russian Kh-35 cruise missile.
2 300 pound warheads don’t seem like enough to wreck a ship like that.
I’m guessing the sheer kinetic energy caused by speed + fuel adds a lot to the Blast?
“Who made the missile?”
Apparently Ukraine.
Ukraine is alleged to have been doing a lot of military industrial work that was started under the Soviets.
I’ve read that it is a design derived from a Soviet/Rooskie product.
If Ukraine can do it, the CCP could do also do it to a US aircraft carrier, if they’re lucky enough to get past its defenses.
But I thought a Neptune Missile based only upon it's name would be launched from underwater.
(unless from our Space Force, of course of course)
The Nomad is a really nice background prop.
Are you saying that surface ships don't carry nuclear warheads or just that Russia will never admit to it?
I'm pretty sure our aircraft carriers, and probably other surface ships, do carry nuclear warheads.
Carriers, like tanks, are useless and dead without screening forces.
Absolute proxy war in Ukraine.
US military is having a field day with this proxy war using current military hardware.
Russia stepped into a briar patch set up by CIA and Western intel agencies.
“Meanwhile, Russia is starting to send it’s bombers in.”
Part of the Moskva’s mission was to provide surface-to-air defense for Russian aircraft operating in Ukrainian airspace. Without this floating anti-aircraft battery the Ukrainians have much more leeway to start using their fighters to destroy attacking Russian aircraft including bombers.
At best the bombers could operate from within Russia or Belarus where land based defenses can help to protect them.
The Neptune is a Ukraine copy of the russian SS-N-25 Switchblade AKA the “harpoonski”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.