I don’t know, I think discounting the entire article on the basis of that (I didn’t see it as “pro-life bigotry” as you did) is a bit like throwing out the baby with the bathwater, so to speak.
I didn’t see it that way.
I admit, I almost felt some repellence at her usage in her narrative of the example of a pregnant cat being spayed, but in retrospect, I think that is acceptable because even if one FEELS it and is going through it (as she did with her own abortion) that person doesn’t actually SEE it happening. Humans are very visual, so it doesn’t surprise me that having an abortion would be one thing, but SEEING one, even on an animal, would be quite a different thing.
I would disagree with discounting the article, stanne. I think it has merit. But we may disagree on this.
The l point of her piece is to recognize the organization she works with. She exalts it by saying nothing but nasty, bigoted things about other pro life groups.
You can say whatever you want about my reaction. She lost me.