Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zhang Fei

I have looked everywhere. There is no evidence it was sunk in action. No imagery of missile hit. No satellite photos of such a thing.

I have just examined Exocets from the Falklands War. The warhead size is identical to Neptun. Exocets hit several UK ships in the Falklands.

Every one of them sank — from being towed. Even the famous HMS Sheffield sank and the missile that hit it never exploded. Residual propellant set fires. She sank days later while being towed. Towing is very risky even for unharmed ships, but if weather is heavy there is no choice. Atlantic Conveyor too Exocet hits. Sank while towed.

Case in point, destroyer HMS Glamorgan took an Exocet hit. Repaired. She was sold to the Chilean Navy and served there for 12 years.

And then it sank. While being towed.


7 posted on 04/14/2022 8:08:17 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Owen

If the ship was struck by missiles, the Xiden administration would have released [leaked] satellite imagery by now...to state nothing of the nonexistent drone footage provided by the Ukranians themselves.


10 posted on 04/14/2022 8:16:46 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Owen

The evidence that she was sunk in action is that the Ukes CLAIMED it. Before even the Rukes acknowledged there was a fire. That is evidence. Not that we can trust one side over the other, but it is evidence nonetheless.

In addition, a bunch of other Russian ships have fled the coastal zone. That wouldn’t have happened if it were merely a fire, but woulda happened if they figured out they were in range of antiship missiles.


14 posted on 04/14/2022 8:29:45 PM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Owen

My gramps was aboard the Hancock in 1945.

They had to tow a ship and keep it moving to prevent it from sinking, while they got it under control and did repairs, for days. Then they had to get back to Hawaii for actual full blown drydock-level repairs.


18 posted on 04/14/2022 8:40:30 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Owen
....There is no evidence it was sunk in action. No imagery of missile hit. No satellite photos of such a thing.

It occurred on a dark and stormy night at sea. Sorry that Instagram, Facebook, twitter, and tik tok were unable to produce selfies of this clandestine operation to your satisfaction. Maybe you can apply for security clearance to access DOD sat images. I sympathize with your pain but surely there is a social media support group out there for you.

87 posted on 04/15/2022 5:19:22 AM PDT by Covenantor (We are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and fools who can not govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Owen

Exactly. AP says it is sunk. I haven’t seen anything to indicate that to be so. All the Russians have admitted is that it was evacuated.

Not sure I believe that either, since it would be beneficial for my enemies to believe the ship is not operational when it actual is.


98 posted on 04/15/2022 6:10:30 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson