Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RandFan

He’s right. The Obama administration wanted to make these changes, so they asked congress to pass a new law clarifying the definition of a receiver. That was 2016.


5 posted on 04/11/2022 12:50:56 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: packagingguy
The Obama administration wanted to make these changes, so they asked congress to pass a new law clarifying the definition of a receiver. That was 2016.

Guess the joke is on the Joetato and his puppet masters then, because that means an injunction against the new rule should take about 15 minutes to get for exceeding statutory authority.

It's even funnier because some circuits have already held that the GCA definition does not match either a complete AR upper or lower.

The danger is that the current crop of Dem scum in control of Congress could try to write a more expansive definition.

15 posted on 04/11/2022 1:15:44 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson