Before I could believe this, I what to see the raw data, The sampling size, and the distribution of the satiistical analysis, and what was considered to be the raw ethic break down.
Next who were the PHDs or analyst who did the work.
Then most important who paid for the work to be done.
Always follow the money to find out how much bias is needed to get paired for the work
My apologies for my fat fingered spelling and not checking my own work. Typing fast on a cell phone is just as bad as trying to read a MSM journalist’s news piece.
I hate autocorrect most days