Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson

That’s pretty thin soup. Me, I go with the view espoused by SCOTUS itself, that judicial review is not in the Constitution, but was established in Marburg v Madison when the justices invented the grand tradition of torturing statutory language, in this case the Judiciary Act of 1789, to fit their desired end.
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about


26 posted on 04/07/2022 10:04:27 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (21 years on Free Republic, 12/10/21! More than 5000 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: j.havenfarm

Marbury, of course. #%*?! spell check


27 posted on 04/07/2022 10:05:27 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (21 years on Free Republic, 12/10/21! More than 5000 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: j.havenfarm

Well you are entitled to your opinion, but it is in the Constitution and the authors of the Constitution meant it to be so Marbury v Madison invented precisely nothing.


36 posted on 04/07/2022 12:02:13 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson