Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theoria
Our constitution doesn't mean much to our courts and Warrants must be person specific. The gentleman killed was not on the warrant. He had every right to defend himself against any intruder, include cops.

"Fourth Amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

No knock aside, a warrant MUST be person specific. The gentleman killed in this no knock warrant was not on the warrant. He had every right to defend himself and stand his ground against ANY uninvited intruder.

14 posted on 04/06/2022 10:22:38 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JesusIsLord

They were looking for one man, at 3 different locations, all of which a Minneapolis judge signed off on for no-knocks... Only to find out the guy they were looking for was in a completely different city...


21 posted on 04/06/2022 10:54:26 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson