Skip to comments.
Portland, region hemorrhaging rental properties (Portland, OR gov destroys rental market.)
Pamplin Media Group ^
| 04/05/2022
| Jim Redden
Posted on 04/05/2022 1:23:10 PM PDT by aimhigh
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
From one of the comments: "The City is currently considering a New Law that would Tax property owners more to pay for Tenants Lawyers during EVICTIONS."
1
posted on
04/05/2022 1:23:10 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
To: aimhigh
2
posted on
04/05/2022 1:23:56 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( I make airplanes fly, what's your super power?)
To: aimhigh
Both reports said the declines followed the enactment of new rental regulations. They included a Portland requirement that landlords pay the relocation of tenants who say they cannot afford their rent increases.UNBELIEVABLE.
3
posted on
04/05/2022 1:30:43 PM PDT
by
Lizavetta
To: aimhigh
3,987 rental houses were lost in Portland over that period, a 14% reduction. The new report also said 6,417 rental houses were lost in the larger region, an 11% reduction during the same period. . . . . Lost? Did they misplace them? Move them to Seattle? Burn them down? Leave them abandoned? Or were they sold to people who wanted to reside in their newly purchased homes resulting in 3,987 newly owner occupied homes in Portland?
Generally, when a neighborhood goes from owner occupied to rented, it is on the way downhill like where I live. Not too many yet, but more than before. Thus owners moving in would upgrade a neighborhood.
4
posted on
04/05/2022 1:35:38 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(If Hitler invaded Hell, I would make at least a favourable reference of the Devil...-Churchill)
I wonder if any rich demonrats are buying cheap peasant free property at bargain basement rates to build the 21st century Elysium
5
posted on
04/05/2022 1:40:45 PM PDT
by
dsrtsage
( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
To: KarlInOhio
Move them to Seattle?Nah, they moved them to Beaverton...lol
6
posted on
04/05/2022 1:44:58 PM PDT
by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
To: aimhigh
They win either way.
this allows rack and stacking of people
and furthers agenda 21
7
posted on
04/05/2022 1:46:50 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Lizavetta
they should forget the ballot box...that is entirely controlled by the inner city rats...instead, form groups, storm city council meetings in an orderly fashion...overwhelm them....demand resignations...impeach....tie things up in court...
8
posted on
04/05/2022 2:01:33 PM PDT
by
cherry
(;)
To: aimhigh
9
posted on
04/05/2022 2:05:45 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
To: mewzilla
10
posted on
04/05/2022 2:06:39 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
To: aimhigh
Communists always think they can legislate economics. Interesting that the topic of insurance wasn’t raised in the article. I would have to imagine the cost of insurance must have jumped quite a bit after the riots and the unwillingness of the local government to protect property.
11
posted on
04/05/2022 2:13:50 PM PDT
by
SeeSharp
To: aimhigh
Once the politicians in Portland Oregon inserted themselves into every rental agreement in the city by not letting landlords evict tenants during COVID-1984, it was inevitable that landlords would walk away. Who would ever take that risk again?
To: mewzilla
A new state law in California does the same thing.
Don't Oregonize California.
To: aimhigh
What did they think would happen when they imposed a 14 month rent moratorium? Did they think that would increase the supply of rental stock? If they did they are too dumb to breath our oxygen.
14
posted on
04/05/2022 2:19:11 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
To: aimhigh
Why would anyone in a socialist regime ever want to be a landlord?
To: aimhigh
If I owned a rental house there, I’d just burn it down, take the insurance money, sell the lot, and build somewhere else. Probably in Idaho.
16
posted on
04/05/2022 2:29:21 PM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
To: aimhigh
can’t fix stupid - enjoy the suck portland - you voted for it.
To: Socon-Econ
>>Why would anyone in a socialist regime ever want to be a landlord?
I live in a blue state - not in a million years would I become a landlord for residential properties.
To: aimhigh
I considered renting my PDX home when I decided to move to Seqttle area but I heard enough horror stories that I sold my place and took the money and ran.
The people who are running Portland are insane.
19
posted on
04/05/2022 2:35:38 PM PDT
by
Aria
To: aimhigh
Lost? They weren’t lost- they were bought. Mortgage rates in the 3% range for reasonably qualified buyers made owning an option for lots of people who had been long-time renters. If you bought low long ago, you had a large equity buildup as prices escalated. If you bought at the top of the prior market cycle you had the chance to at least break even or take a little profit.
Add in the pro-tenant/anti-landlord regulations in some places and you have a selling incentive.
20
posted on
04/05/2022 2:59:27 PM PDT
by
JimRed
(TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson