Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil
Yes - But I want concrete figures on the actual number of large-scale accidents, not descriptions of what could happen.

I think that plain commonsense tells us that the spillage of something which will rapidly evaporate is less devastating than the spillage of something that will persist, on site, for years, maybe decades.

Regards,

34 posted on 04/03/2022 1:55:54 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek

thermobaric


35 posted on 04/03/2022 2:08:56 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: alexander_busek; kiryandil

I think the threat that kiryandil was referring to was explosion, rather than spill.

For example, somebody shooting a big storage tank on a LNG ship with a Javelin.


41 posted on 04/03/2022 3:57:15 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: alexander_busek

Maybe you should research “LNG explosion” and stop being obtuse.


58 posted on 04/03/2022 8:35:51 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson