Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

The problem with “agreements” by the USA is they carry no force of law as does a treaty. We learned this in 6th grade. The diplomats should have been aware of this in their negotiations. Guarantee a neutral Ukraine in exchange for security assurances and nukes.

If it were a treaty this whole situation would not happen. And these things are exactly what is being negotiated between the two now. Only now a lot of people are dead. And yes it would be much preferable that a skillet negotiator were President. Maybe someone whose initials are DJT.


55 posted on 03/30/2022 3:40:52 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: packagingguy

The problem with “agreements” by the USA is they carry no force of law as does a treaty.
***Oh, sure they do. If we wanted to we could send whatever forces we want into that region. The Gulf of Tonkin was on much thinner grounds.

We learned this in 6th grade.
***Then the 6th graders are about to learn another set of lessons, perhaps. It would be the lessons that people who face a suitcase nuke in a Russian city suffer because their
@$$#0/e leader chose to OBVIOUSLY violate an agreement in their name.

The diplomats should have been aware of this in their negotiations.
***Do you suppose the diplomats are aware of the Uke nuke program right now? Ever wonder why the Ukes sent a missile into Russian territory, hmmmmmm?
https://nypost.com/2022/03/29/ukraine-missile-may-have-hit-military-camp-inside-russia/

Guarantee a neutral Ukraine in exchange for security assurances and nukes.
***Those assurances are worth less than their weight in toilet paper. We are pushing the Ukes into a nuke corner by not showing “respect” for their borders.

If it were a treaty this whole situation would not happen.
***When Vlad is backgrounded by a nuke plume above his favorite Ruke city, we’ll get back to you on this pantywaist appeasement approach.

And these things are exactly what is being negotiated between the two now.
***You may be right. Having the ability to send just one missile onto Russian territory could be enough to back off the Russians permanently. Where do YOU think the nuke demo should go off inside Russia, assuming there’s only maybe 5 or 6 suitcase nukes?

Only now a lot of people are dead.
***We are pushing the Ukes in their existential war into a nuke corner, where a helluva lot more people could be dead.

And yes it would be much preferable that a skillet negotiator were President.
***Skilled, I take it. When we did have a skilled negotiator, there were NO incidents with Vlad the Imploder. Imagine that.

Maybe someone whose initials are DJT.
***We’ll never get the libtards to own up to that.


56 posted on 03/30/2022 3:55:06 PM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson