Posted on 03/28/2022 12:22:01 PM PDT by mfish13
The homos are mad that their grooming of children is being restricted. They never cared about actually educating children.
Given my choice and if I were 20 years younger, I'd do a lot more than marginalize these queers.
It is the goal of the left. News groups such as CNN are leading the charge.
It amazes me that the party that loved Jeffery Epstein and Harvey Weinstien are interested in the genitals of 5 years old kids.
LOL! Hillarious what is considered “controvesial” these days.
Only a generation or two ago, discussing this stuff with students would get you a prison term.
“No way those who are calling it the “Don’t Say Gay” bill have actually read it.”
**************************************************************
So...You really believe the smear artists, who are intent on deceiving low info drones by lying about the content of the bill, would instead be telling the truth, had they only read the bill? And since they are calling it the “Don’t say gay” bill, therefore is proof they haven’t read it?
Sorta like folks at the Times/CNN who were telling us the Hunter laptop story was Russian disinformation actually believed what they were telling us?
Sorta like, folks at CNN/Times/Democrat party telling us Trump colluded with Putin/Russia have integrity and were really pure at heart and truly believed Trump was colluding? And, in no way would they have lied to us?
Coexistence is a lie. Steel yourselves.
Only gay groomers are upset by this.
I bet there are a lot of gay people who support this legislation as well.
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/PDF
There is nothing anti-homosexual in the bill. It just clarifies the parental right to be informed of what their 5-8 year-old children are being taught in school, and permits those parents to object if the material taught is inappropriate.
3. Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students.
Who the hell objects to a bill that tries to minimize the sexualization of 5-8 year-old children? Answer: People in favor of the sexualization of 5-8 year-old children.
If it’s only “controversial” to less than 5% of the population, it’s not controversial.
It doesn’t go far enough. No need to discuss LGBT at all at any grade level, unless it is to be disparaged.
Unbelievable that allowing parents to steer their kids away from the GAYSTAPO is somehow controversial. It is pretty much in display that liberals do not think parents should have a role in their kids’ education.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.