Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EMERGENCY DOCKET Court allows Department of Defense to reassign unvaccinated Navy SEALs
SCOTUS Blog ^ | March 25, 2022 | Amy Howe

Posted on 03/26/2022 10:52:52 AM PDT by truthkeeper

The Supreme Court on Friday gave the Pentagon the go-ahead to consider whether some members of the elite Navy SEALs are vaccinated against COVID-19 when making operational decisions. With three justices noting dissents, the court temporarily blocked an order by a federal trial court that U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said would commandeer “the Navy’s authority to decide which servicemembers should be deployed to execute some of the military’s most sensitive and dangerous missions.” The ruling came over the objection of a group of SEALs who oppose the Navy’s vaccination policy on religious grounds; the SEALs had argued that what the Navy really wants is “permission to engage in hostile tactics designed to coerce” the SEALs “into disregarding their religious beliefs.”

In August 2021, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin announced that all active-duty members of the military must be vaccinated against COVID-19. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday affects only the Navy’s ability to consider whether the SEALs and other members of the Naval Special Warfare Command are vaccinated when making personnel decisions – for example, about whom to deploy and where. The government had not asked the justices to allow it to enforce other aspects of its vaccine policies that the SEALs are challenging and a trial court in Texas had also blocked, such as allowing it to discipline or discharge unvaccinated servicemembers.

(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/26/2022 10:52:52 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

When will the Courts and the Military start to follow the Science?


2 posted on 03/26/2022 10:55:11 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

I thought RATs hated people who killed seals....oh, that was the other kind of seals. Sorry


3 posted on 03/26/2022 10:56:46 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

I suspect they will put them on a one way Chinook like Obama did with seal team six . Rebellion will not be tolerated by globalists


4 posted on 03/26/2022 10:57:51 AM PDT by KTM rider (, or how Ambassador Stevens was killed because he was about to testify before the UN council )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
I disagree with the vaccine requirement. That being said, I don't think the courts should ever be in the position of directing assignments of military personnel - for any reason. Far too slippery a slope that could permit courts to order that specific commands be granted on the basis of gender, race, or some other classification.

That is different from courts being able to prevent someone from being discharged or otherwise suffer a specific loss of rank or service time pay and benefits.

5 posted on 03/26/2022 11:00:39 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( .</I><p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
They'll risk Navy SEALS by sending them on dangerous military operations ... but having them work beside unvaccinated fellow SEALS is too great a risk?
6 posted on 03/26/2022 11:07:06 AM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

The DoD decides what medical protective posture is needed for overseas deployments. If they say the COVID or any other shot is required for deployment then that’s it. For example, I was was also ordered to take the PB pill in the GW even though it was an experimental drug and effed up a lot of people. A waiver can be given but the rules for protection of the force takes Precedence and the medical requirements of the country they are deploying to are also factored in. The law that says you cannot give experimental drugs to soldiers applies to CONUS/non-deployed service members.
So it is likely the Seals and the support staff not vaccinated are not going to deploy until the HPCON posture changes and the hard rule for taking the vaccine is lifted.


7 posted on 03/26/2022 11:14:12 AM PDT by Liaison (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

Nothing like castrating our armed forces eh.


8 posted on 03/26/2022 11:14:13 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

When will the Courts and the Military start to follow the Science?

https://sharylattkisson.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SA-Store-not-science.jpg

If you are not allowed to debate it, it isn’t science!


9 posted on 03/26/2022 11:16:26 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Playing “Make Believe” is for liberal adults/children. It is past time to grow up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97
...having them work beside unvaccinated fellow SEALS is too great a risk?

Exactly right, because only an unvaxed SEAL can transmit covid... no, wait... only an unvaxed SEAL can catch covid... no, wait...

I know, it's because training an 'operator' is super expensive, and only an unvaxed SEAL can die from covid... no, wait...

10 posted on 03/26/2022 11:39:25 AM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("...mit Pulver und Blei, Die Gedanken sind frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Liaison
Right. I had the same choice during the same war, and took the damn thing.

You simply cannot have the courts getting involved in decisions regarding the assignment of military personnel. Far too many decisions in the military are time-critical, and giving courts the authority to insert themselves in those decisions would be a damn disaster.

So though I disagree with the military policy regarding assignment of unvaccinated personnel, I do agree that it must be the military's decision to make. Not the courts.

11 posted on 03/26/2022 11:40:02 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( .</I><p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Liaison

Liaison wrote: “The DoD decides what medical protective posture is needed for overseas deployments. If they say the COVID or any other shot is required for deployment then that’s it.”

Too many seem to think that following orders is optional.


12 posted on 03/26/2022 12:03:04 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Liaison

Well. That’s at least a few that won’t die fighting King Brandon and the Banana Republic’s wars.

And maybe a few that won’t turn the guns around on Americans for refusing government mandates.


13 posted on 03/26/2022 12:27:57 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

Good old rapey boy Kavenaugh to the rescue again. What a dud. And after how hard conservatives fought for him.


14 posted on 03/26/2022 1:03:07 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

The military members believe they are slaves, kneel like slaves.
They are not. They are humans with the rights.
The more that kneel to authoritarians the less I trust them. As a veteran with an active duty son, lost my son in law in Iraq before I could even meet the father of my grandchild, I can say that.


15 posted on 03/26/2022 1:05:48 PM PDT by momincombatboots (Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

There go the Seals. They were an amazing force.


16 posted on 03/26/2022 1:07:19 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

all over a virus that nearly every single military person, who are in great physical condition usually, would survive just fine. Gee what are the military gonna do with flue’s each year? Refuse to allow people to remain unvaccinated should they choose to be?


17 posted on 03/26/2022 1:13:40 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

“So though I disagree with the military policy regarding assignment of unvaccinated personnel, I do agree that it must be the military’s decision to make. Not the courts.”

And when the treasonous military flag staff sides with the enemy, then what?


18 posted on 03/26/2022 3:01:32 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
And when the treasonous military flag staff sides with the enemy, then what?

If we're at the point where all the flag officers are loyal to the enemy, then it isn't going to make a damn bit of difference who the courts put in charge of individual ships or units anyway.

The issue is basically competency, and courts would be simply horrible at deciding who should be in command of individual units, or who should be in each kind of unit, etc..

19 posted on 03/26/2022 3:12:45 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( .</I><p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Okay, you’ve reasonably and successfully argued that the courts shouldn’t be involved in selecting convoy admirals and COs of combat divisions. What’s the proper solution to rid the military of Obuma’s woke weenies in command positions?


20 posted on 03/26/2022 3:30:19 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson