She was chosen as a black woman.
How can it be that she can also not define woman?
The illogical world of the left. That’s how.
Next we will give out fake medical licenses to anyone that wants to identify as a surgeon or a drug dealer can claim to be a pharmacist.
This is an easy question to answer. Since she doesn’t know what a woman is, she’ll hear both sides of a case (without a biologist) and pick a definition she thinks fits - which will be the anti-American one.
Unfortunately, Blackburn wanted to get through her prepared questions instead of taking a great opportunity to engage the nominee on the opening she presented. Ask her if she ever filled out a college application, what box did she check? etc etc ... Then tell her she was disingenuous in saying she did not know. How can one trust a person to be on the SCt when they won’t be straight with you, even on simple questions. Katanji might be a “nice neighbor” to have living next door but she lacks the judicial temperament, character and candor that all SCt justies should have.
What a warped nation we live in that a potential Supreme Court member refuses to define something as simple as a woman.
God help us when she gets a case with a moderately difficult decision - and all cases that get to the USSC are difficult.
The irony is, it's much easier to define sex than race.
She was chosen as a black woman.
We’ve seen how well Biden fills important positions with “women of color”.
His first attempt is an unmitigated disaster. Why break precedent?