Is it too cynical to think that this article is just propaganda? The article just presents us with a lot of nuthin, imo:
“allegedly”
“was said to”
“purportedly”
“claims were not independently verified”
Exactly. What’s up with all of these yapping teacup poodles calling people stupid names like “Putin lover” just for questioning the veracity of some of the stories out there? We’re not even denying the stories; we’re questioning them.
Anybody who takes what the MSM spews at face value without question is a brainwashed sheep. Questioning possible propaganda does not mean we support Putin, for crying out loud.
Maybe we should start calling the people who become shrill and hysterical at those of us who question the stinkin’ media “Soros lovers?”
It makes as much sense as them calling us “Putin lovers.”
The people of the West used to think that a least most of what we read in the papers more or less reflected reality.
We knew there was editing and choices of items taking place, but the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop content (which some of us watched via NY Post and offshore sources) was an evil, traitorous, history-changing choice that even the most cynical could not believe. Any notion of thinking we know the news via the big sources has been blown to smithereens. Nobody with half a brain knows what to believe any more. It takes a lot of digging to find news sources that are still up and available and uncensored and undoctored.
With all the propaganda we’ve been hearing from this conflict, I’ll wait for it to be verified before reacting to it.