How is there a gender pay gap in unionized jobs? Typically collective bargaining for a contract is going to spell out labor rates. If the collective bargaining agreement says women get less than men then the union and the federal government are already breaking the law. Something doesn’t sound right here.
It happens when a woman leaves to have kids. If they were out four months, their annual raise would reflect the time out of work. Over ten years, and two kids, that gap could grow.
Most companies “fixed” that decades ago.
Of course the government talks a good game, but they don’t apply market adjustments to their world because they are idiots.
This is all virtue signaling.
It is already illegal to offer different pay for men vs women. Oh, and how come a Fed regulation even admits that there are men or women?
Anyhoo, what is the deal about what an applicant received in a previous job somewheres else? So what?
Meaningless crappola to appease the NPC’s. But, I am sure some airhead in HResources will go nuts on this.
It is a myth. A lie. A fabrication. Just something to keep the idiot progressives in a frenzy.