Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OA5599
The analogy made by the other poster was that if we wouldn't tolerate Russian nuclear missiles in Cuba, Russian shouldn't have to tolerate a Ukraine allied with other nations.

For the reasons I gave, that's pretty cracked reasoning.

113 posted on 03/10/2022 5:59:38 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I suppose if you look at exactly the blockade portion of the Cuban Missile Crisis, then you are correct. I wasn’t really seeing that as an isolated incident however, and I don’t think anyone can.

Immediately prior to the Soviets installing missiles in Cuba, the United States led an invasion of Cuba to overthrow its leader. When that failed, we attempted to assassinate its leader. This is because Cuba was aligned with the Soviets.

The same year as the Bay of Pigs Invasion (which is prior to the CMC), the United States deployed Jupiter ICBMs in Turkey. Not only did Turkey border the Soviet Union, but those missiles were within range of Moscow. The Soviet Union responded by installing ballistic missiles in Cuba. The rest is history...

None of this justifies the Russian invasion of Ukraine of course, but I think it’s a valid analogy. Did the US have the right to lead the BOP Invasion? (Okay, yes that’s technically different than the CMC, but I don’t see them as separate conflicts as much as two different incidents in a larger conflict.)


120 posted on 03/11/2022 8:37:03 AM PST by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson