NATO and the INF Treaty

Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev and United States President Ronald Reagan sign the INF Treaty at the White House, Washington, DC, in 1987. A historic moment for Alliance security.

The INF Treaty was signed on 8 December 1987 by the United States and the former Soviet Union, and entered into force on 1 June 1988. It required both countries to eliminate their ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles that could travel between 500 and 5,500 kilometres (between 300 and 3,400 miles) by an implementation deadline of 1 June 1991.

By the deadline, the two countries had together destroyed a total of 2,692 short- and intermediate-range missiles: 1,846 Soviet missiles and 846 American missiles. It marked the first elimination of an entire category of weapons capable of carrying nuclear warheads.

But in recent years, Russia has developed, produced, tested and deployed a new intermediate-range missile known as the 9M729, or SSC-8. The 9M729 is mobile and easy to hide. It is capable of carrying nuclear warheads. It reduces warning times to minutes, lowering the threshold for nuclear conflict. And it can reach European capitals.

In July 2018, NATO Allies stated that after years of denials and obfuscation by the Russian Federation, and despite Allies repeatedly raising their concerns, the Russian Federation had only recently acknowledged the existence of the missile system without providing the necessary transparency or explanation. A pattern of behaviour and information over many years led to widespread doubts about Russian compliance. NATO Allies said that, in the absence of any credible answer from Russia on this new missile, the most plausible assessment was that Russia was in violation of the Treaty.

In December 2018, NATO Foreign Ministers supported the finding of the United States that Russia was in material breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty and called on Russia to urgently return to full and verifiable compliance with the Treaty.

Allies remained open to dialogue and engaged Russia on its violation, including at a NATO-Russia Council meeting on 25 January 2019. Russia continued to deny its INF Treaty violation, refused to provide any credible response, and took no demonstrable steps toward returning to full and verifiable compliance.

As a result of Russia's continued non-compliance, on 1 February 2019, the United States announced its decision to suspend its obligations under Article XV of the INF Treaty. This meant that the United States could terminate the Treaty within six months of this date if Russia had not come back into compliance.

Also on 1 February 2019, NATO Allies said that unless Russia honoured its INF Treaty obligations through the verifiable destruction of all of its 9M729 systems, thereby returning to full and verifiable compliance, Russia would bear sole responsibility for the end of the Treaty. NATO Allies also made clear that NATO would continue to closely review the security implications of Russian intermediate-range missiles and would continue to take steps necessary to ensure the credibility and effectiveness of the Alliance's overall deterrence and defence posture.

On 15 February 2019, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg recalled at the Munich Security Conference that "it was on this very stage, at the Munich Security Conference in 2007, this was the place that President Putin first publically expressed his desire for Russia to leave the INF Treaty. A treaty that is only respected by one side will not keep us safe".

The Alliance did everything in its remit to encourage Russia to return to compliance before 2 August 2019 so as to preserve the INF Treaty.

On 26 June 2019, NATO Defence Ministers urged Russia once again to return to full and verifiable compliance. They also considered potential NATO measures – such as exercises, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, air and missile defences, and conventional capabilities – and agreed that NATO would continue to ensure a safe, secure and effective nuclear deterrent. At the same time, Defence Ministers confirmed that NATO had no intention to deploy new land-based nuclear missiles in Europe, and did not want a new arms race.

On 2 August 2019, the United States’ decision to withdraw from the Treaty took effect. NATO Allies issued a statement fully supporting the US decision, and attributing “sole responsibility” for the Treaty’s demise to Russia. The statement made clear that NATO would respond in a “measured and responsible way” to the risks posed by Russia’s SSC-8 system, with a “balanced, coordinated and defensive package of measures,” ensuring credible and effective deterrence and defence. Allies also made clear their firm commitment to the preservation of effective international arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation.

"By fielding multiple battalions of SSC-8 missiles, Russia has made the world a more dangerous place." Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General

A Soviet inspector examines a BGM-109G Gryphon ground-launched cruise missile in 1988 prior to its destruction.

Under the INF Treaty, the United States and Russia cannot possess, produce or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile with a range capability of 500 to 5,500 kilometres, or possess or produce launchers of such missiles.

The INF Treaty gives precise definitions of the banned ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles:

-An intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) is a ground-launched ballistic or cruise missile having a range capability between 1,000 and 5,500 kilometres. The term "ballistic missile" means a missile that has a ballistic trajectory over most of its flight path.

-A shorter-range missile means a ground-launched ballistic or cruise missile having a range capability between 500 and 1,000 kilometres. The term "cruise missile" means an unmanned, self-propelled vehicle that sustains flight through the use of aerodynamic lift over most of its flight path.

-23 May 2013: The United States first raises its concerns with Russia about the missile system.

-5 September 2014: Wales Summit: Allies call on Russia to preserve the viability of the Treaty.

-9 July 2016: Warsaw Summit: Allies call on Russia to answer US charges and preserve the viability of the INF Treaty.

-9 December 2017: Russia admits the SSC-8/9M729 exists but claims it is compliant.

-11 July 2018: NATO Allies declare that Russia appears to be violating the INF Treaty.

-20 October 2018: The United States announces its intention to withdraw from the Treaty.

-4 December 2018: The United States declares Russia in material breach of the Treaty.

-4 December 2018: NATO Foreign Ministers support the US finding on Russia's violation.

-25 January 2019: NATO Allies urge Russia to return to compliance at a NATO-Russia Council meeting.

-1 February 2019: The United States announces its decision to suspend compliance with the INF Treaty.

-1 February 2019: NATO Allies issue a statement on Russia's failure to comply with the INF Treaty.

-14 February 2019: NATO Defence Ministers call again on Russia to come back into compliance.

-26 June 2019: NATO Defence Ministers agree that NATO will respond, should Russia fail to return to compliance, and consider potential measures.

-2 August 2019: The United States’ decision to withdraw from the INF Treaty takes effect, with the full support of NATO Allies. Allies issue a statement attributing sole responsibility for the Treaty’s demise to Russia, and announce their decision to respond in a measured and responsible way, while remaining firmly committed to the preservation of effective international arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation.

Thanks for posting. Europe’s NON-RESPONSE to his violation of the treaty likely was a big factor in assuming that he could take Ukraine with relatively little response by the rest of the world.

What I suspect he didn’t understand was that the media/Soros would never permit a response in Europe (which means deploying nukes of our own).

In 1990, I was a INF Treaty Inspector in the Soviet Union. While I was on the road to Smolensk in a heavy snowstorm, I spotted an SS-23 transporter-launcher off the side of the road, upside down burned.

By that date, there weren't supposed to be any SS-23s left, anywhere.

The Soviets denied that I saw what I saw - and our own 3-letter agencies told me "all SS-23s and their related transporters have been destroyed"

I still have a photo of that wreck and I ceased believing anything our government had to say on anything after that.

NATO is a menace to the US. BECAUSE we honor our commitment signed. This agreement was signed by President Reagan as well as others international agreements,i.e. The Budapest Memorandum signed by Clinton

Putin has no honor.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.