Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: where's_the_Outrage?
"“If the Supreme Court truly honored the rule of law and precedent [??? emphasis added], then they would acknowledge the power of the agencies that was granted to them by Congress in order to save our environment,” Warren told TPM."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Post-17th Amendment ratification Sen. Warren doesn't dare mention that the states have never expressionally constitutionally given the feds the specific power to police the environment.

"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

Next, patriots are reminded that they must vote twice this election year. Your first vote is to primary career RINO incumbents. Your second vote is to replace outgoing Democrats and RINOs with Trump-endorsed patriot candidates.

Insights welcome.

23 posted on 03/02/2022 3:09:41 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amendment10

I don’t see how they get around the Raich precedent, in which Scalia wrote in a concurring opinion =>


“Where necessary to make a regulation of interstate commerce effective, Congress may regulate even those intrastate activities that do not themselves substantially affect interstate commerce.”


40 posted on 03/02/2022 5:13:13 PM PST by Ken H (Trump won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson