Posted on 03/02/2022 4:20:23 AM PST by xzins
servantoftheservant wrote: “Yet you do nothing to refute the scientific study that shows that liver DNA was indeed altered and altered quite rapidly. Your deeply fractured mind is perfectly fine with this fallacy.”
Oh, but I did when I pointed out that this was in vitro, not in vivo. Many things happen in vitro that cannot be replicted in vivo.
P-Marlowe wrote: “They have denigrated themselves. They are unsafe and ineffective. You never answered. Who is paying you to Pimp these Jim Jones jabs?”
They’re safe and they prove their effectiveness every day.
You never said who was paying you to make false claims about the vaccines. Why not?
why are you pushing drugs on people that don’t want them?...
You’re not concerned?
- that this apparently wasn’t tested?
- that tests show it happens?
- that we have NO IDEA what that means for someone’s life and health in the short, medium, and long term?
- that getting this shot is still a condition of many people’s livelihoods?
Are you ... insane? Psychotic?
servantoftheservant wrote: “You’re not concerned?
- that this apparently wasn’t tested?
- that tests show it happens?
- that we have NO IDEA what that means for someone’s life and health in the short, medium, and long term?”
This was tested, in vitro, which means not in a persons body. Many things happen in vitro that do not happen in the body. So this in vitro test does not show it happens in vivo, in a persons body.
There have been over 10 billion vaccine doses administered world wide. Over 23 million doses are administered every day. Can you give an example of where this has happened in any of these 10 billion doses?
Ha! Did I call it, or what?
Just like clock IN/OUT work, $hift working $hot $hill DugwayBioweaponDuke⏰ doesn’t reply, until it clocks in for today’s shift, just after 6 a.m./7 a.m. E. to spew its CDC/FRAUDci provided drivel.
With the establishment retreating from their former restrictions in a rush to the getaway car, it boggles the mind that these guys still won’t admit that we at least had a case worth looking into.
Jane Long wrote: “Ha! Did I call it, or what? Just like clock IN/OUT work, $hift working $hot $hill DugwayBioweaponDuke⏰ doesn’t reply, until it clocks in for today’s shift, just after 6 a.m./7 a.m. E. to spew its CDC/FRAUDci provided drivel.”
Mercola/Malone/Kennedy must be paying you to be here “just after 6 a.m./7 a.m. E. to spew to spew the anti-vaxxer drivel they have provided.
Wow....the bot can even copy and paste MY original claim, about YOU/YOUR $hift working $hot $hill crew.
Can’t even come up with your own phrasing/replies. Everything is copied/pasted and/or CDC provided.
All I can say is they’re paying YOU way too much.
What is also mind boggling is how the obvious (8-5) $hift $hot $hilling is allowed to continue....even when their lying narrative is completely falling apart.
Jane Long wrote: “Can’t even come up with your own phrasing/replies.”
Your comments do not deserve more.
Yet another profound reply from the 9-5 clock in/out, DugwayBioweaponLabDuke⏰/$hift working $hot $hill bot, with CDC/BigPharma provided ‘replies’.
No thanks and NO SALE, $hot troll.
And, from you, yet another profound statement repeating Mercola/Malone/Kennedy provided anti-vaxxer propaganda. Do you ever come up with something original?
You’re both projecting *and* overpaid.
Here’s an analysis of the posted study. Just another figment of the anti-vaxxer imagination. Once again fake news.
In summary:
“This paper provides no evidence whatsoever that the mRNA sequences in the Pfizer vaccine (and presumably the Moderna vaccine) are being incorporated into the genetic code of the recipient. In artificial in vitro conditions, the researchers forced reverse transcription, but they did not show that this could happen in a living human being and they didn’t show that the DNA segments were incorporated (or even could be incorporated) into the genome.”
That’s what I mean — it hasn’t been tested. Which is unconscionable. We don’t know
Oddly, it sounds like your author doesn’t like the Swedish researchers
***3. The article reads like the authors have a chip on their shoulder about the mRNA vaccines. They overlook real science about reverse transcription to hit a point that they are dangerous — in other words, they have a preconceived conclusion, and by the beard of Charles Darwin, they’re going to prove that the vaccine is dangerous. It’s almost propaganda.***
xzins wrote: “Oddly, it sounds like your author doesn’t like the Swedish researchers.”
Not Swedish researches, just researchers that do not do credible work.
So, he is the judge of them?
xzins wrote: “So, he is the judge of them?”
He justified his opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.