Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hardspunned
If you check historical invasion routes into Russia and the comparative military capabilities involved, I think you’d dismiss it as well. You make an excellent point though.

How far back?

Historically, the Swedes attacked the Russians via the Baltics, and Prussia also, as late as the end of the 18th Century.

64 posted on 02/28/2022 5:46:40 PM PST by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!

How about the route every Russian knows about in great detail, Hitler’s run through the Ukraine. Today Ukraine has two armored brigades that have been sitting on the Russian border. They have 7 artillery brigades. The day after Ukraine has been admitted to NATO, NATO has these resources sitting on the Russian border with pretty much unlimited reserves. Can’t you see how dangerously provocative this would be? Why would we want to do this? I’m sorry Ukraine is in this position it has been in the last three hundred years. I’m sorry for Syrian Christians, the list is long. We are talking about NATO, which is Germany plus what, 70% of world GDP as allies. Like I’ve said before, would we allow 2 Warsaw Pact armored brigades sitting in the deserts of Chihuahua? Hell no, we wouldn’t have tolerated it. Where was the world outcry when Biden, Obama and the US State Department was raping Ukraine economically and using it as their personal vassal state, and probably still are? Is that what everyone is so anxious to screw around with a potential WWIII over, keeping the US corrupted Ukrainian oligarchs in power?


65 posted on 02/28/2022 6:09:54 PM PST by hardspunned (former GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson