[JGPhila]

I think you make a good point. Although the attorney-client privilege protects communications between a lawyer and client, it is not absolute. If it can be shown the lawyer and client were engaged in a crime, then none of their communications, oral or written, are protected and all would be fair game for use by the prosecutor.

[rdcbn1]

One thing big law firms do have is very detailed billing records. Durham has been subpoenaing the lawyers billing records to establish who did what to whom - and for how much and who paid who. Once he has that info, he has cause he needs to go further and pierce the attorney-client privilege veil. This could be much bigger than Watergate if he can document a conspiracy between big law firms, the DOJ/FBI, FISA Court, Intelligence agencies, the media, and politicians in office and Hillary Clinton/DNC