Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: qaz123
-- If a law enforcement official says that he'll only answer a question if he's given immunity, that should be raising a tsunami of questions as to what happened. --

For the reasons that you expressed. The officer believes he has acted outside of the law. Oh well. Just another day on the job. Deed done, no reversing that, and no consequences to whoever "pulled the trigger," other than (maybe) a tounge lashing. He'd do it again.

12 posted on 02/18/2022 11:30:05 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Except for Kim Potter, who’s looking at 20+ years in prison, right? No consequences for her, right? She did what she did, she admitted to doing what she did. And she’s dealing with the consequences.

Lt Michael Byrd, murders a diminutive, unarmed woman and NOTHING.

So, the qualified immunity argument is so screwed up it’s hard to know which way is up anymore.

Again, if this guy is asking for anything, then something went wrong. He knows it. He wants distance from it. But, at the end of the day, it’s those same politicians that give him the qualified immunity.

However, we are talking about Australia, not the US. That is perhaps a huge thing to overlook. Do the cops in Australia have the same immunity as they do in the US?


14 posted on 02/18/2022 11:35:12 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson