I pretty much agree with the article, unfortunately.
There were 14 criminal referrals that the House Judiciary Committee alone had queued up waiting for Durham when he was appointed. That’s not counting the ones from others such as in the Senate.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-expects-many-more-durham-indictments
Yet not one of these has ben acted on. Instead, he’s been chasing this new rabbit down the hole that DNS lookups were used to instigate spying of Trump. Well that’s good to know, except the spying of Trump was already well underway by that time, due to the phony Steele dossier.
It’s possible that Durham’s scope has been limited in his charter to only “new” information that hadn’t been discussed by anyone prior to his appointment. If that’s true, he could already be close to running out of real estate.
My general point of view is that other than process crimes (lying to Congress or an investigation), there is nothing there - not that there is nothing wrong, there is lots wrong. But there is no crime.
It is not a crime for Congress to lie to the people. It is not a crime to conduct a bogus investigation on bogus allegations, meaning it is not a crime for the government to frame an innocent person, or even, for that matter, to convict him of a crime he did not commit. Is it wrong? Of course. Is it criminal? Nope.
And the only power a white hat in DOJ has (white hat in DOJ is a unicorn), is to prosecute crimes.
It’s folly to try to fix the corruption with resort to law. Law itself has been subverted in order to perpetrate bad things against the public. It’s all legal.