Nine Sandy Hook families agree to $73M settlement with Remington

UK Daily Mail ^ | 2/15/2022 | AP and Ronny Reyes

[vetvetdoug]

Charles Whitman

I watched that unfold on live TV on a feed from the Austin TV station thru the San Antonio station. They fed it live the whole time...

[Ronald77]

This is bull shi. The person behind the firearm killed not the gun or the manufacture. Just more democrat crap

[Salvavida]

So if you brain someone with a claw hammer, the manufacturer of the hammer is at fault. Brilliant.

How about a nail gun?

[TexasFreeper2009]

total BS since I am nearly 100% sure the kid probably never once saw an ad for it.

[Chode]

who owns/runs Ilion now?

[rx]

It's like Sen. Hawley questioning Secretary Mayorkas recently concerning "friendly litigation," about which the HHS Secretary, who's a lawyer, claimed to know nothing, never having heard of it.

The Left sues the Leftists in government and pretty soon, the parties come to an amicable settlement that is then used as a precedent and blueprint for future "resolutions" (favorable to the Left).

Question one of the Left's hoaxes and you'll be strung up like Alex Jones. In 2022 we see that institutionalized in social media and medical professionals censorship and firings. Truckers' livelihoods are threatened, peaceful demonstrators face huge fines and stiff prison sentences.

You'll recall the media and Leftists in Congress going after President Trump for merely making claims of the stolen 2020 election. He brought forth evidence, but not only did the Deep State's operatives not want to hear it, they wanted PDJT punished for daring to make the claims. Mentions were treated as if PDJT was fomenting armed (pipe bomb) lawlessness. It all became bound up in what the Left screeched was the "worst day in history," the J6 "insurrection."

Each day facts becomes clearer, however, that what happened in DC J6 was as yet another hoaxed event perpetrated by Pelosi, the FBI and its accomplices.

For the Left, members of its opposition are ipso facto, terrorists, to be gunned down like LaVoy Finicum.

[TexasFreeper2009]

Remington and legally owned by his mother, which means she bought it, not him.

He never saw an ad, and there was zero wrong with that ad.

[TexasFreeper2009]

she school is more to blame than the gun manufacture, heck! might as well sue the car company or the model he rode there in!

[bramps]

Using their children’s deaths to cash in on a frivolous lawsuit

**************************************

Yup. Pretty sick.

[MikeSteelBe]

Id rather be shot with a 30-06 AP than a .223 HP.

[Cold Heart]

.223 55gr 3100 fps

30-06 150gr 3100 fps

[lewislynn]

The gun maker appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case.

That's the most dangerous sentence in the article.

[bantam]

This is just unbelievable!!
Amerika has fallen.
How in the world can Remington be found responsible for anything related to SH????

[OL Hickory]

Can someone help me out here?

how does one settle with a company
that is broken up and out of business?

[Hambone 1934]

EXACTLY!!!!!!!

[GingisK]

Their .22LR gets the most misfires possible in each box of 50.

[libertylover]

Oh, bad idea Remington. Very, very bad idea.

[Cold Heart]

“...there was zero wrong with that ad”.

I saw and ad just like that about 60 years ago. It was an anti-gun ad.

[Colorado Doug]

Yes, they will be very sorry. This will open the floodgates. What a dumb move.

[wgmalabama]

I find it disgusting when people decide to feed from the lawyers pig trough over blood. Great get your money. Hope they spend it all on cheap heroin. It would be one thing to sue those responsible for it but really this is BS.