The Expose’ is sensationalist crap. Look at the study and see how they are misinterpreting the data.
There are real concerns about long term vaccine effects, including immunity suppression, antibody dependent enhancement, and latent virus revitalization.
The problem with sites like the expose’, is that the legacy media points to their fallacious sensationalism and then dismisses all of the legitimate concerns out of hand, almost as if Expose’s was part and parcel of the scam.
Wait until Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Robert Malone, or Peter McCullough raise a concern, because they will if it’s justified.
If you think their methodology and calculations are flawed, can you explain why?
How have they miscalculated the rate data?
What is a better way to calculate rates?
What are the actual rates?
Dealing with those who are good at misrepresenting information takes time, effort and is draining. I get that. If it takes a while to explain it, then please take the time to explain it.
They are.
What is wrong with the figures from the UK official site?