Well, that’s not quite true. I read yesterday that there are 47,000 vacant houses, condos, znd apartments in the SF metro area due to people moving out. So why doesn’t the gover ment appropriate these empty dewellings? Legally they can’t so it’s easier to make you feel guilty and take in a few street bums. Truth is, homeless hell, street bums.
OK, go to court and get a Judge to sign off on voiding the property rights of the legal owners. After that you can forget any new apartments being built in SF, god help they have a vacant unit because someone just moved out and no one has rented yet. Also does the City really want to be come a landlord with the responsibilities and costs?
I already had a version of a ‘street bum’.
He was called my first Ex-husband.