Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders Air Force to pay $230M in Texas church shooting
Axios ^ | 02/08/2022 | Erin Doherty

Posted on 02/08/2022 10:13:30 AM PST by aimhigh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: Manly Warrior

Exactly so and in that case the civilian authority would have to update the database, not the Air Force.


61 posted on 02/10/2022 6:13:03 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Manly Warrior

Actually the Civil authority would prosecute a felony against his family and the Air Force didn’t convict him of a felony.


62 posted on 02/10/2022 6:19:58 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Manly Warrior
Since nobody answered my initial question about needing details, I looked at Wikipedia.   I see that there was no civilian prosecution so it was only the Air Force that would have updated the database.
Kelley was brought before a general court-martial on four charges: assault on his wife, aggravated assault on his stepson, two charges of pointing a loaded gun at his wife, and two counts of threatening his wife with an unloaded gun. In November 2012, Kelley pleaded guilty to two counts of Article 128 UCMJ, for the assault of his wife and stepson. In return, the weapons charges were dropped.[43][44][45] He was sentenced to 12 months of confinement and a reduction in rank to Airman Basic. He appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, but was unsuccessful.[46] In 2014, he was dismissed from the Air Force with a bad conduct discharge.[47][48]

63 posted on 02/10/2022 6:28:12 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

Yes. More than a year= felony. Dropped weapons charges = No Lautenberg ?

Seems like he was not a prohibited person by the standards of the law.


64 posted on 02/11/2022 5:26:09 AM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson