Replies

Then Biden and Harris point to the results of the vote of the Electoral College, the counting the votes by Congress, the sign-off on all elections by the appropriate state authorities, the various state audits that showed no fraud and say that is their authority to hold the office. Then what?

A recitation of the federal side of elections still requires a LAWFUL state election. In this case it was 'discovered' after the fact. It's only been a week that the GA state court made its ruling the mail ballot rules were not legal, and the election happened anyway.

Once the quo warranto ruling is made, Congress can remove the states 2 (D) Senators, and 8 (R), 9 (D) Representatives. Then it up to Congress to remove them and make any other corrections, like removing legislation they voted on?

A recitation of the federal side of elections still requires a LAWFUL state election.

It was a LAWFUL election according to all the sources I gave.

It's only been a week that the GA state court made its ruling the mail ballot rules were not legal, and the election happened anyway.

Well, to begin with it was Pennsylvania, not Georgia. The mail-in voting were not struck down as a result of any of the claims of fraud. And the Court didn't say the elections were invalid.

Once the quo warranto ruling is made, Congress can remove the states 2 (D) Senators, and 8 (R), 9 (D) Representatives.

Plus all the state legislators and state elected officials elected since the law was passed. Don't forget them. Also a warrant has to be filed first. Let me know how you do.