It is entirely possible for us to support Ukraine without putting any US troops in the country. Weapons, supplies, and in particular up-to-date intelligence and satellite imagery. Doesn’t cost a single US life but might deter Russian aggression.
Yes. Tucker Carlson doesn't address this, and I don't get it. FTR, I am a big fan of his.
“It is entirely possible for us to support Ukraine without putting any US troops in the country. Weapons, supplies, and in particular up-to-date intelligence and satellite imagery. Doesn’t cost a single US life but might deter Russian aggression.”
You’re correct.
When Risch votes for sanctions against Russia for “democracy” the average American will be “eating” higher energy prices.
Risch is a stupid monkey, doing what he’s “told to do” by his masters in Washington DC.
What’s the difference between price controls & sanction stupidity?
Answer: Not very much.
That's what they said about "Lend Lease" back in 1940, but we got into the war anyway.
Doesn't cost a single US life??
By becoming a belligerent in a war in which we have no interests, you put literally hundreds of millions of US lives at stake.
Russia is not Granada, or Panama, or Libya. It's not Serbia. It's not Iraq.
It is a well-armed nuclear power defending its vital interests in a matter where we have no vital interests at stake.
Supplying a belligerent army is being a belligerent yourself.