Posted on 02/02/2022 3:08:34 AM PST by Kaslin
Numbers mean things.
Public companies use numbers to convey the health, growth, and promise of their firm. If their numbers are fake, don’t reconcile, or have hidden data not conveyed to the investors, CEOs and CFOs can and do go to prison.
Why should election rolls meet a lesser standard?
Why do election rolls fail to reconcile internally? Why do election rolls have hundreds to thousands of dead people or voters whose address is a church or RV park? Why are citizens forced to pay $12,500, $30,000, or $5,000 for a single copy of their election roll?
Why do most states (likely all) have hundreds to thousands of “voters” on their rolls born on the same day before World War I? Why do some states allow voters to use a prison as their mailing address?
Voter rolls must be given the same scrutiny as public companies’ financial statements. They are not—it’s not even close.
Sarbanes-Oxley demands CEOs and CFOs review all financial reports to make certain they do not contain any misrepresentation. Every statement must be “fairly presented.” No scammy stuff; no sleight of hand.
Secretaries of state and election officials are not required to do any of these things. So, guess what happens?
In Alabama, there are over 3,300 voters on the rolls over the age of 100. The top 9 are over 1,000 years old.
Most Americans have never met someone over 112 years of age. Just go to Alabama: They have 482 of them on their current election roll.
2,500 or more Alabama voters share a phone number, some of whom started using that number in 1972.
There are even 18 active voters in one of their city jails.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Having managed the IT of a FINRA regulated financial services company, I can tell you that part of what we did to meet the requirements of SOX compliance was to use WORM media. WORM is write once, read many backup media wherein data cannot be changed once written. Its not cheap but it is available, reliable, and meets our needs to help secure the vote. WORM media would enable an irrefutable audit trail for what has happened in the election process, insofar as data storage is concerned. It would not help with situations where votes are counted numerous times instead of just once, or where ballot boxes are stuffed by criminals. It would just be part of the whole picture.
The Establishment (Repubs and Dems) don’t want clean voters roles or organized efficiently run elections. They don’t want to give the power to the voters. They been controlling / determining elections for decades.
We need to go back to dumb voting machines.
Even if the voter rolls are cleaned up and every voter is a legal voter, with those RCV-enabled voting machines in use, Deep State can still steal elections.
Sorry but sarbox is window dressing. as well as mark to market.
Oddly the most honest elections in the Western Hemisphere are in Mexico. Years ago they were not. Today they are.
See link below about their voter id card.
https://www.gi-de.com/en/spotlight/identities/voting-id-cards-mexico
Why? Because democrats and their pets are part of the criminals class - and fools in the GOP are afraid of being called 'racist'...
Democrat ‘elites’ and the democrat criminal underclass that props them up do NOT want a secure system. Democrats don’t even want citizens to have to show an ID...
Does the Federal Government pay a subsidy to the counties to help defray the cost of a Federal Election???
If so-—This subsidy is the incentive to NOT clean up the voter rolls.
Examples:
IF the subsidy is $1 per voter, then 10,000 phantom voters gets a subsidy of $10,000 for that county.
If the subsidy is $10 per voter, then those 10,000 phantom voters gets the county $100,000 of free money.
In many SMALL counties around the country-—that $100,000 is ALOT OF MONEY !!!!
There are 3144 counties in the USA.
One state found over 55,000 phantom voters-—That would get $550,000 for those counties. Not a joke.
Do some calculations of your own. Read the articles about the vote discrepancies & apply the possible subsidy money in your own calculations.
That ‘free money’ is a great incentive-—and it leads to major vote errors.
Excellent points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.